Performance Improvement Quarterly

843 papers and 9.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 843 papers published in Performance Improvement Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 9.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Performance Improvement Quarterly usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (237 papers), Applied Psychology (235 papers) and Education (162 papers) specifically the topics of Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (220 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (91 papers) and Organizational Learning and Leadership (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Performance Improvement Quarterly are Timothy J. Newby, Peggy A. Ertmer, J. Kevin Ford, Gordon Rowland, Daniel A. Weissbein, Kurt Squire, Stephen L. Yelon, Constantine Kontoghiorghes, John Wedman and Charles B. Hodges.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Performance Improvement Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Performance Improvement Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Performance Improvement Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Performance Improvement Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Performance Improvement Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Performance Improvement Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Performance Improvement Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025