Francesco Chiesa
- Molecular Biology
- Parasitology top 5%
- Food Science top 5%
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tiziana CiveraSelene RubiolaSilvia GallinaLucia DecastelliDaniela Manila BianchiPierluigi Aldo Di CiccioFelice PanebiancoAlberto Bellio
- Topics
- Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (15 papers)Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (11 papers)Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaApplied and Environmental MicrobiologyFrontiers in Microbiology
In The Last Decade
Francesco Chiesa
48 papers receiving 661 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Molecular Biology 194
- Parasitology 178
- Food Science 167
- Biotechnology 123
- Infectious Diseases 121
Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Chiesa
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Chiesa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Chiesa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Chiesa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Chiesa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Chiesa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Chiesa. The network helps show where Francesco Chiesa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesco Chiesa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesco Chiesa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesco Chiesa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francesco Chiesa. Francesco Chiesa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | Diagnostic criteria of chronic lesions caused by Taenia saginata metacestodes in bovine myocardium. | 1 |
| 20 | 16 |
About Francesco Chiesa
Francesco Chiesa is a scholar working on Parasitology, Biotechnology and Food Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (15 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (11 papers) and Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (178 citations), Biotechnology (123 citations) and Food Science (167 citations). Francesco Chiesa has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Portugal and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Tiziana Civera, Selene Rubiola, Silvia Gallina, Lucia Decastelli, Daniela Manila Bianchi, Pierluigi Aldo Di Ciccio, Felice Panebianco, Alberto Bellio, Alessandra Dalmasso and Guerrino Macori. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Frontiers in Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.