Emma Little
- Education top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Mandy KienhuisRebecca GialloAlan HudsonRay WilksClare ReltonMark GreenPenelope NestelRichard Cooper
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers)Behavioral and Psychological Studies (6 papers)Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emma Little
15 papers receiving 663 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Education 525
- Social Psychology 272
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 263
- Clinical Psychology 207
- Cognitive Neuroscience 57
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Little
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Little's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Little with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Little more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Little
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Little. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Little. The network helps show where Emma Little may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Little
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Little. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Little based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Little. Emma Little is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 339 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | Behaviour Problems across Home and Kindergarten in an Australian Sample. | 22 |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | 79 | |
| 13 | Teachers' Perceptions and Management of Disruptive Classroom Behaviour During the Middle Years (years five to nine). | 68 |
| 14 | Classroom behaviour problems: The relationship between preparedness, classroom experiences, and self-efficacy in graduate and student teachers | 117 |
| 15 | Conduct Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence [Book Review] | 1 |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 24 |
About Emma Little
Emma Little is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Pharmacy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (6 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (263 citations), Education (525 citations) and Social Psychology (272 citations). Emma Little has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mandy Kienhuis, Rebecca Giallo, Alan Hudson, Ray Wilks, Clare Relton, Mark Green, Penelope Nestel, Richard Cooper, Mark Strong and Jeff Walkley. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, BMJ Open and Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.