Emily C. Tanner
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Marketing top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Information Systems and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- John F. TannerRichard J. VannKirk L. WakefieldKevin E. VossMayoor MohanYong‐Ki LeeMing‐Hui ZhaoLiang Wu
- Topics
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (5 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers)Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementMarketingInformation Systems and Management
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Emily C. Tanner
19 papers receiving 280 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 82
- Sociology and Political Science 81
- Marketing 51
- Molecular Biology 42
- Information Systems and Management 37
Countries citing papers authored by Emily C. Tanner
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily C. Tanner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily C. Tanner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily C. Tanner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily C. Tanner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily C. Tanner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily C. Tanner. The network helps show where Emily C. Tanner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily C. Tanner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily C. Tanner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily C. Tanner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily C. Tanner. Emily C. Tanner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 75 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | Activity Agreement Pilots : quantitative evaluation | 1 |
| 20 | 9 |
About Emily C. Tanner
Emily C. Tanner is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Marketing and Information Systems and Management, having authored 22 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (5 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (82 citations), Marketing (51 citations) and Information Systems and Management (37 citations). Emily C. Tanner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include John F. Tanner, Richard J. Vann, Kirk L. Wakefield, Kevin E. Voss, Mayoor Mohan, Yong‐Ki Lee, Ming‐Hui Zhao, Liang Wu, Dong‐Yuan Chang and Min Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Kidney International and European Journal of Marketing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.