Edmund King
- Education top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Demography top 10%
- Safety Research
- Co-authors
- W. D. HallsColin LaceyRobert A. LevineA. C. F. BealesH. C. BarnardRobert A. ScottPhilip G. AltbachM. T. Clanchy
- Topics
- Global Education and Multiculturalism (16 papers)Global Educational Policies and Reforms (13 papers)Religious Education and Schools (5 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsBritish Journal of SociologyThe Journal of Human Resources
- Partner nations
- MexicoUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Edmund King
43 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Education 334
- Political Science and International Relations 229
- Sociology and Political Science 155
- Demography 56
- Safety Research 17
Countries citing papers authored by Edmund King
This map shows the geographic impact of Edmund King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edmund King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edmund King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edmund King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edmund King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edmund King. The network helps show where Edmund King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edmund King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edmund King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edmund King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edmund King. Edmund King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | Education for uncertainty | 17 |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Other Schools and Ours: A Comparative Study for Today | 18 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Edmund King
Edmund King is a scholar working on Education, Political Science and International Relations and Classics, having authored 54 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Education and Multiculturalism (16 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (13 papers) and Religious Education and Schools (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (334 citations), Political Science and International Relations (229 citations) and Demography (56 citations). Edmund King has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include W. D. Halls, Colin Lacey, Robert A. Levine, A. C. F. Beales, H. C. Barnard, Robert A. Scott, Philip G. Altbach, M. T. Clanchy, James Scotland and Gordon G. Darkenwald. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, British Journal of Sociology and The Journal of Human Resources.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.