M. T. Clanchy
- Classics top 0.1%
- Medieval Literature and History 16
- History top 0.5%
- Historical and Archaeological Studies 4
- Scottish History and National Identity 4
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 2
- Communication top 10%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
-
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 4
-
- Medieval and Early Modern Justice 2
- International Law and Human Rights 1
-
- Irish and British Studies 2
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryCommunication
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexicoUnited States
In The Last Decade
M. T. Clanchy
27 papers receiving 367 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Classics 283
- History 194
- Communication 56
- Language and Linguistics 78
- Anthropology 67
Countries citing papers authored by M. T. Clanchy
This map shows the geographic impact of M. T. Clanchy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. T. Clanchy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. T. Clanchy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. T. Clanchy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. T. Clanchy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. T. Clanchy. The network helps show where M. T. Clanchy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside M. T. Clanchy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 2 | Charters, Cartularies, and Archives: The Preservation and Transmission on Documents in the Medieval West | 2005 | 9 |
| 3 | The new Cambridge medieval history, IV: c. 1024-c. 1198 | 2005 | 1 |
| 4 | 2005 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 6 | Early medieval England | 1997 | 1 |
| 7 | Abelard: A Medieval Life | 1997 | 26 |
| 8 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 9 | Literacy, Law, and the Power of the State | 1985 | 3 |
| 10 | England and Its Rulers, 1066-1272: Foreign Lordship and National Identity | 1983 | 9 |
| 11 | "From memory to written record. England 1066-1307", M. T. Clanchy, London 1979 : [recenzja] / Jerzy Strzelczyk. | 1981 | 9 |
| 12 | 1981 | 16 | |
| 13 | "Tenacious Letters": Archives and Memory in the Middle Ages | 1980 | 4 |
| 14 | 1975 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1974 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1973 | 46 | |
| 17 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1970 | 18 | |
| 19 | 1967 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1964 | 3 |
About M. T. Clanchy
M. T. Clanchy is a scholar working on Classics, History and Philosophy, having authored 30 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (16 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (4 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (4 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Medieval and Early Modern Justice (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (283 citations), History (194 citations) and Communication (56 citations). M. T. Clanchy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eleanor Searle, Edmund King, E. L. G. Stones and Lesley Smith. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Legal History, History, Speculum, The English Historical Review and The Journal of Ecclesiastical History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.