This map shows the geographic impact of Dow Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dow Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dow Scott more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dow Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dow Scott. The network helps show where Dow Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dow Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dow Scott.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dow Scott based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dow Scott. Dow Scott is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bishop, James W., et al.. (2012). An investigation of determinants of turnover intention among truck drivers in the USA.. Advances In Management. 6(3).2 indexed citations
3.
Mahajan, Ashish, James W. Bishop, & Dow Scott. (2012). Does trust in top management mediate top management communication, employee involvement and organizational commitment relationships?. Journal of managerial issues. 24(2). 173–24.29 indexed citations
4.
Scott, Dow. (2012). Blending General Increases With a Pay-for-Performance Policy.
Scott, Dow, et al.. (2007). The assessment of public entity board professionalism in South Africa, with specific reference to SETAs. Southern African Business Review. 11(2). 79–97.2 indexed citations
Scott, Dow, et al.. (2003). In the Hands of Employees. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University Chicago). 3(10). 16.1 indexed citations
10.
Scott, Dow, et al.. (1988). A New Job for the '90s: The Productivity-Gainsharing Coordinator May be the Answer to Improved Employee Productivity. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University Chicago). 33(8).1 indexed citations
11.
Scott, Dow, et al.. (1987). Tracking the Merit of Merit Pay. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University Chicago). 32(3).6 indexed citations
12.
Scott, Dow, et al.. (1987). Employee attendance: good policy makes good sense. 32(12).3 indexed citations
13.
Scott, Dow, et al.. (1987). Merit Pay: Just or Unjust Desserts. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University Chicago). 32(9).2 indexed citations
14.
Scott, Dow, et al.. (1985). Controlling absenteeism: A national study of union and non-union differences. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University Chicago). 30(2).2 indexed citations
15.
Scott, Dow, et al.. (1985). Rewarding Good Attendance: A Comparative Study of Positive Ways to Reduce Absenteeism. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University Chicago). 30(8).11 indexed citations
Scott, Dow, Diana L. Deadrick, & Gary Taylor. (1983). The evolution of personnel research. Personnel journal. 62.1 indexed citations
18.
Scott, Dow & Brian R. Cook. (1983). The Relationship Between Employee Age and Interpersonal Trust Within an Organizational Context. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University Chicago). 18(3).5 indexed citations
19.
Scott, Dow & Gary Taylor. (1983). An analysis of absenteeism cases taken to arbitration: 1975-1981. 38(3).8 indexed citations
20.
Scott, Dow, et al.. (1982). Absenteeism Control Methods: A Survey of Practices and Results. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University Chicago). 27(6).26 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.