Diana Bilimoria

5.3k total citations
91 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Diana Bilimoria is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Bilimoria has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Gender Studies, 33 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Diana Bilimoria's work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (43 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (12 papers) and Mentoring and Academic Development (12 papers). Diana Bilimoria is often cited by papers focused on Gender Diversity and Inequality (43 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (12 papers) and Mentoring and Academic Development (12 papers). Diana Bilimoria collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Diana Bilimoria's co-authors include Deborah A. O’Neil, Margaret M. Hopkins, Sandy Kristin Piderit, Xiangfen Liang, Kathleen Buse, Abigail J. Stewart, Simy Joy, Ruth Sessler Bernstein, Sheri Perelli and Angela M. Passarelli and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Business Ethics and Journal of Organizational Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Diana Bilimoria

88 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diana Bilimoria United States 28 1.6k 992 745 726 580 91 3.1k
Mary C. Johannesen‐Schmidt United States 9 2.0k 1.3× 1.1k 1.1× 1.1k 1.4× 396 0.5× 625 1.1× 11 3.3k
Phyllis Tharenou Australia 34 1.6k 1.0× 2.1k 2.1× 1.2k 1.7× 479 0.7× 822 1.4× 75 4.6k
Marloes van Engen Netherlands 26 2.1k 1.3× 1.8k 1.8× 1.2k 1.6× 346 0.5× 753 1.3× 71 4.1k
Mustafa F. Özbilgin United Kingdom 34 2.0k 1.3× 1.4k 1.4× 1.6k 2.2× 286 0.4× 442 0.8× 179 4.2k
Susan Vinnicombe United Kingdom 28 1.9k 1.2× 1.2k 1.2× 690 0.9× 957 1.3× 299 0.5× 68 2.9k
Eddy S. Ng Canada 33 1.0k 0.6× 1.6k 1.6× 1.1k 1.4× 218 0.3× 565 1.0× 101 3.8k
Katerina Bezrukova United States 16 1.5k 0.9× 1.0k 1.0× 960 1.3× 389 0.5× 603 1.0× 40 2.6k
Sharon A. Lobel United States 18 1.2k 0.7× 1.1k 1.1× 1.1k 1.5× 279 0.4× 775 1.3× 30 2.8k
Michelle A. Dean United States 14 1.2k 0.7× 1.6k 1.6× 880 1.2× 290 0.4× 407 0.7× 22 3.1k
Amy E. Randel United States 21 1.5k 1.0× 2.0k 2.1× 1.4k 1.9× 256 0.4× 971 1.7× 39 4.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Bilimoria

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Bilimoria's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Bilimoria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Bilimoria more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Bilimoria

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Bilimoria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Bilimoria. The network helps show where Diana Bilimoria may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Bilimoria

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Bilimoria. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Bilimoria based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Bilimoria. Diana Bilimoria is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bilimoria, Diana, et al.. (2022). Double‐conscious professional self‐expression of racial minority scientists‐in‐training. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 45(3). 397–415. 5 indexed citations
2.
Bilimoria, Diana, et al.. (2022). The Gaslighting of Women of Color CEOs: Sensegiving and Sensebreaking Tactics That Center Whiteness. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2022(1). 1 indexed citations
3.
Bilimoria, Diana, et al.. (2021). The factors influencing Saudi Arabian women's persistence in nontraditional work careers. Career Development International. 26(5). 720–746. 7 indexed citations
4.
Hopkins, Margaret M., et al.. (2018). How perceived riskiness influences the selection of women and men as senior leaders. Human Resource Management. 57(4). 915–930. 18 indexed citations
5.
Bilimoria, Diana, et al.. (2018). Busting the Gender Binary: Activities for Teaching Transgender Issues in Management Education. Management Teaching Review. 5(4). 335–350. 3 indexed citations
6.
Wei, Hongguo, et al.. (2017). How Does Culture Matter? TheXin(Heart-Mind)-based Social Competence of Chinese Executives. Management and Organization Review. 13(2). 307–344. 5 indexed citations
7.
Bilimoria, Diana, et al.. (2016). Taking Your Talents to Business Communications. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. 40(6). 769–793. 3 indexed citations
8.
Bilimoria, Diana, et al.. (2015). Shared vision between fathers and daughters in family businesses: the determining factor that transforms daughters into successors. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 625–625. 26 indexed citations
10.
Bilimoria, Diana & Xiangfen Liang. (2011). Gender Equity in Science and Engineering: Advancing Change in Higher Education. Routledge Studies in Management, Organizations and Society.. 1 indexed citations
11.
Bilimoria, Diana, Simy Joy, & Xiangfen Liang. (2008). Breaking barriers and creating inclusiveness: Lessons of organizational transformation to advance women faculty in academic science and engineering. Human Resource Management. 47(3). 423–441. 211 indexed citations
12.
Bilimoria, Diana. (2006). The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers.. Journal of managerial issues. 126 indexed citations
13.
Hopkins, Margaret M., Deborah A. O’Neil, & Diana Bilimoria. (2006). Effective leadership and successful career advancement: perspectives from women in health care. Equal Opportunities International. 25(4). 251–271. 18 indexed citations
14.
Bilimoria, Diana, et al.. (2004). Characteristics of Women and Men Corporate Inside Directors in the US. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
15.
Bilimoria, Diana. (1998). The Editor's Corner. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. 22(4). 449–451. 2 indexed citations
16.
Bilimoria, Diana. (1997). A qualitative comparison of the boardroom experiences of US and Norwegian women corporate directors. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 32 indexed citations
17.
Bilimoria, Diana, et al.. (1997). Isomorphism in Organization and Management Theory. Organization & Environment. 10(4). 384–406. 14 indexed citations
18.
Bilimoria, Diana. (1997). Management Educators: In Danger of Becoming Pedestrians on the Information Superhighway. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. 21(2). 232–243. 27 indexed citations
19.
Huse, Morten & Diana Bilimoria. (1997). Tales About Directorates - As Reported By Women Directors. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society. 8. 139–150. 1 indexed citations
20.
Bilimoria, Diana & Jane V. Wheeler. (1995). Learning-Centered Education. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. 19(3). 409–428. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026