Debra Panizzon

522 total citations
44 papers, 304 citations indexed

About

Debra Panizzon is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Debra Panizzon has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 304 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Education, 8 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 7 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Debra Panizzon's work include Education Systems and Policy (11 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (10 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (7 papers). Debra Panizzon is often cited by papers focused on Education Systems and Policy (11 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (10 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (7 papers). Debra Panizzon collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and Canada. Debra Panizzon's co-authors include John Pegg, Andrew J. Boulton, Terry Lyons, Ray Cooksey, Stephen Keast, Ian Mitchell, Frances Quinn, Deborah Corrigan, Martin S. Westwell and Xavier Fazio and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Conservation Biology and Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

In The Last Decade

Debra Panizzon

41 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Debra Panizzon Australia 9 242 58 32 28 19 44 304
Robert A. Lonning United States 6 236 1.0× 92 1.6× 30 0.9× 35 1.3× 18 0.9× 6 305
Barry Mccrae Australia 6 386 1.6× 167 2.9× 26 0.8× 42 1.5× 42 2.2× 9 468
Anders Isnes Norway 3 299 1.2× 171 2.9× 17 0.5× 33 1.2× 42 2.2× 5 365
Lisbeth Åberg‐Bengtsson Sweden 8 163 0.7× 48 0.8× 23 0.7× 39 1.4× 10 0.5× 17 225
Michele Gregoire United States 4 260 1.1× 109 1.9× 32 1.0× 45 1.6× 36 1.9× 7 322
Overson Shumba Zambia 9 157 0.6× 24 0.4× 12 0.4× 29 1.0× 22 1.2× 34 251
Marilyn Frankenstein United States 5 443 1.8× 35 0.6× 16 0.5× 142 5.1× 10 0.5× 15 543
Denis Goodrum Australia 6 296 1.2× 114 2.0× 91 2.8× 23 0.8× 39 2.1× 11 330
Iván Salinas Chile 8 218 0.9× 79 1.4× 25 0.8× 40 1.4× 25 1.3× 11 301
M. Gail Jones Australia 5 300 1.2× 93 1.6× 70 2.2× 37 1.3× 31 1.6× 12 347

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Panizzon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Panizzon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Panizzon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Panizzon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Panizzon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Panizzon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Panizzon. The network helps show where Debra Panizzon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debra Panizzon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debra Panizzon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debra Panizzon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debra Panizzon. Debra Panizzon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fazio, Xavier, et al.. (2018). Austrália, Brasil e Canadá: impacto das avaliações no ensino de Ciências. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 29(70). 188–221. 4 indexed citations
2.
Panizzon, Debra, et al.. (2018). Exploring the 'hard facts' around STEM in Australia: females, low socioeconomic status and absenteeism. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 26(8). 30–44. 5 indexed citations
3.
Westwell, Martin S. & Debra Panizzon. (2012). Becoming explorers of our world: The purpose of science education. 22–40. 1 indexed citations
4.
Pegg, John & Debra Panizzon. (2011). Collaborative innovations with rural and regional secondary teachers: enhancing student learning in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 23(2). 149–167. 6 indexed citations
5.
Panizzon, Debra, et al.. (2010). Exploring the Profile of Teachers of Secondary Science: What Are the Emerging Issues for Future Workforce Planning?.. Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University). 56(4). 18–24. 5 indexed citations
6.
Panizzon, Debra, et al.. (2010). Facilitating Students' Ownership of Learning in Science by Developing Lifelong Learning Skills. Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University). 56(3). 27–32. 5 indexed citations
7.
Quinn, Frances, John Pegg, & Debra Panizzon. (2008). First‐year Biology Students’ Understandings of Meiosis: An investigation using a structural theoretical framework. International Journal of Science Education. 31(10). 1279–1305. 22 indexed citations
8.
Pegg, John & Debra Panizzon. (2007). Inequities in Student Achievement for Literacy: Metropolitan versus Rural Comparisons. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. 30(3). 177–190. 7 indexed citations
9.
Pegg, John, et al.. (2007). Exceptional Outcomes in Mathematics Education. Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University). 3 indexed citations
10.
Panizzon, Debra & John Pegg. (2007). Chasms in Student Achievement. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education. 17(2). 3–20. 8 indexed citations
11.
Panizzon, Debra & John Pegg. (2007). Chasms In Student Achievement: Exploring The Rural-Metropolitan Divide. Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University). 17(2). 3–20. 10 indexed citations
12.
Pegg, John & Debra Panizzon. (2007). Addressing Changing Assessment Agendas: Impact of Professional Development on Secondary Mathematics Teachers in NSW. Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University). 9. 66–80. 5 indexed citations
13.
Panizzon, Debra & Andrew J. Boulton. (2004). Strategies for enhancing the learning of ecological research methods and statistics by tertiary environmental science students. Bioscience Education. 4(1). 1–14. 2 indexed citations
14.
Pegg, John & Debra Panizzon. (2004). Addressing Changing Assessment Agendas: Experiences of Secondary Mathematics Teachers in Rural NSW. Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University). 1 indexed citations
15.
Panizzon, Debra & Andrew J. Boulton. (2000). Biodiversity in Australia: What, Where, and for How Long?.. Australian science teachers journal. 46(4). 17–26. 1 indexed citations
16.
McGee, Steven, Debra Panizzon, John Pegg, & Bruce C. Howard. (2000). Integrating Inquiry-Based Multimedia Learning Outcomes into Educational Accountability Systems. 1 indexed citations
17.
Boulton, Andrew J. & Debra Panizzon. (1998). The knowledge explosion in science education: Balancing practical and theoretical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 35(5). 475–481. 6 indexed citations
18.
Panizzon, Debra. (1998). Demonstrating Diffusion: Why the Confusion?.. Australian science teachers journal. 44(4). 37–39. 6 indexed citations
19.
Boulton, Andrew J. & Debra Panizzon. (1997). Food and Energy in River Ecosystems: Teaching the 'Big Picture'.. Australian science teachers journal. 43(2). 11–20. 1 indexed citations
20.
Panizzon, Debra, et al.. (1997). An analysis of the role of peers in supporting female students’ choices in science subjects. Research in Science Education. 27(2). 251–270. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026