David Pugalee

1.6k total citations
65 papers, 945 citations indexed

About

David Pugalee is a scholar working on Education, Statistics and Probability and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, David Pugalee has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 945 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Education, 21 papers in Statistics and Probability and 18 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in David Pugalee's work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (33 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (19 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (14 papers). David Pugalee is often cited by papers focused on Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (33 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (19 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (14 papers). David Pugalee collaborates with scholars based in United States and Macao. David Pugalee's co-authors include Drew Polly, Chuang Wang, Richard G. Lambert, Christie Martin, Jennifer McGee, Claudia Flowers, Robert J. Rickelman, Meagan Karvonen, Diane M. Browder and Shawnee Wakeman and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Educational Research Journal and Educational Research Review.

In The Last Decade

David Pugalee

59 papers receiving 788 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Pugalee United States 15 775 266 217 114 63 65 945
Michelle Stephan United States 14 847 1.1× 329 1.2× 280 1.3× 123 1.1× 34 0.5× 35 1.0k
Shelley Dole Australia 17 880 1.1× 185 0.7× 258 1.2× 119 1.0× 48 0.8× 98 1.1k
Glenda Anthony New Zealand 16 980 1.3× 247 0.9× 169 0.8× 109 1.0× 21 0.3× 47 1.1k
Amy Roth McDuffie United States 18 1.0k 1.3× 299 1.1× 168 0.8× 37 0.3× 29 0.5× 62 1.1k
Karl W. Kosko United States 16 638 0.8× 244 0.9× 132 0.6× 82 0.7× 32 0.5× 84 830
Joan Ferrini‐Mundy United States 16 778 1.0× 139 0.5× 257 1.2× 82 0.7× 44 0.7× 32 951
Sandra Crespo United States 14 877 1.1× 258 1.0× 329 1.5× 100 0.9× 13 0.2× 55 1.0k
Erdinç Çakıroğlu Türkiye 17 629 0.8× 196 0.7× 109 0.5× 98 0.9× 17 0.3× 61 775
Gabriel J. Stylianides United Kingdom 20 1.2k 1.5× 315 1.2× 592 2.7× 187 1.6× 23 0.4× 55 1.4k
Liping Ma China 9 1.3k 1.7× 210 0.8× 575 2.6× 111 1.0× 19 0.3× 20 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by David Pugalee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Pugalee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Pugalee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Pugalee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Pugalee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Pugalee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Pugalee. The network helps show where David Pugalee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Pugalee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Pugalee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Pugalee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Pugalee. David Pugalee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rorrer, Audrey, et al.. (2024). Pathways to Entrepreneurship (PAtENT) Program: Reimagining STEM Doctoral Programs. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings.
2.
Pérez-Quiñones, Manuel A., et al.. (2023). K-12 Teacher Experiences from Online Professional Development for Teaching APCSA. 1001–1006. 2 indexed citations
3.
Pugalee, David, et al.. (2022). Supporting Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Culturally Responsive Teaching: A Focus on Teaching for Social Justice. Mathematics. 10(6). 896–896. 8 indexed citations
4.
Martin, Florence, et al.. (2022). Professional Development Strategies and Recommendations for High School Teachers to Teach Computer Science Online. Computers in the Schools. 40(2). 133–151.
5.
Martin, Florence, et al.. (2022). Teaching Programming Online: Design, Facilitation and Assessment Strategies and Recommendations for High School Teachers. TechTrends. 66(3). 483–494. 3 indexed citations
6.
Pugalee, David, et al.. (2022). High School Students’ Application of the Engineering Design Process. 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 8. 1–4.
7.
Stephan, Michelle, et al.. (2021). People use math as a weapon: critical mathematics consciousness in the time of COVID-19. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 108(3). 513–532. 19 indexed citations
8.
Martin, Christie, Drew Polly, Chuang Wang, Richard G. Lambert, & David Pugalee. (2016). Perspectives and Practices of Elementary Teachers Using an Internet-Based Formative Assessment Tool: The Case of "Assessing Mathematics Concepts".. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education. 23(1). 3–11. 8 indexed citations
9.
Martin, Christie, Drew Polly, Chuang Wang, Richard G. Lambert, & David Pugalee. (2016). Perspectives and Practices of Elementary Teachers Using an Internet-Based Formative Assessment Tool: The Case of Assessing Mathematics Concepts. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education. 23(1). 3–11. 11 indexed citations
10.
Polly, Drew, Jennifer McGee, Chuang Wang, et al.. (2015). The Association between Teachers' Beliefs, Enacted Practices, and Student Learning in Mathematics. ˜The œMathematics educator. 22(2). 65 indexed citations
11.
Bush, Sarah B., et al.. (2015). Research in Mathematics Educational Technology: Trends in Professional Development over 40 Years of Research.. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference. 1 indexed citations
12.
Martin, Christie, et al.. (2015). Exploring the Relationship between Questioning, Enacted Mathematical Tasks, and Mathematical Discourse in Elementary School Mathematics. ˜The œMathematics educator. 24(2). 4 indexed citations
13.
Ronau, Robert N., Christopher R. Rakes, Sarah B. Bush, et al.. (2014). A Survey of Mathematics Education Technology Dissertation Scope and Quality. American Educational Research Journal. 51(5). 974–1006. 21 indexed citations
14.
Pugalee, David, et al.. (2012). Elementary Students’ Construction of Proportional Reasoning Problems: Using Writing to Generalize Conceptual Understanding in Mathematics. Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden).
15.
Pugalee, David, et al.. (2008). Using Metaphors to Unpack Student Beliefs About Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics. 108(7). 326–333. 36 indexed citations
16.
Pugalee, David, et al.. (2002). Navigating through geometry in grades 6-8. 10 indexed citations
17.
Pugalee, David. (2001). Using Communication To Develop Students' Mathematical Literacy.. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 6(5). 28 indexed citations
18.
Pugalee, David, et al.. (2000). Mathematical and Technological Literacy: Developing an Integrated 21st Century Model.. Radiology Case Reports. 19(11). 5539–5543. 3 indexed citations
19.
Pugalee, David, Warren J. DiBiase, & Karen D. Wood. (1999). Writing and the Development of Problem Solving in Mathematics and Science. Research into Practice.. Middle School Journal. 30(5). 48–52. 3 indexed citations
20.
Pugalee, David. (1998). Promoting Mathematical Learning through Writing.. Mathematics in school. 27(1). 20–22. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026