David O’Brien

1.3k citations
29 papers · 564 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

David O’Brien

25 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

David O’Brien
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Literature and Literary Theory 192
  • Speech and Hearing 117
  • Education 226
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 91
  • Linguistics and Language 25
Replace Jeffrey D. Wilhelm with:
Jeffrey D. Wilhelm United States
Mary B. McVee United States
Gail Boldt United States
Violet J. Harris United States
Laura B. Smolkin United States
Susan Miller United States
Katherine J. Kramer United States
John Reichert United States
Maria Nikolajeva United Kingdom
Kathy G. Short United States
David O’Brien relative to Jeffrey D. Wilhelm United States Jeffrey D. Wilhelm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Jeffrey D. Wilhelm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David O’Brien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David O’Brien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David O’Brien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David O’Brien. The network helps show where David O’Brien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David O’Brien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David O’Brien Line = papers co-authored together David O’Brien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200078
2 200776
3 200875
4 201774
5 201740
6 200739
7 201638
8 200533
9 201120
10 201520
11 202116
12
Juxtaposing Traditional and Intermedial Literacies To Redefine the Competence of Struggling Adolescents.
200311
13 200810
14 20129
15 20107
16 20153
17 20153
18 20133
19 20032
20 20121

About David O’Brien

David O’Brien is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Speech and Hearing, Education, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literacy, Media, and Education (12 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (7 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (3 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (3 papers), Educational Methods and Media Use (2 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers) and Education and Technology Integration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (192 citations), Speech and Hearing (117 citations), Education (226 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (91 citations) and Linguistics and Language (25 citations). David O’Brien has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Richard Beach, Cassandra Scharber, Elizabeth Birr Moje, Deborah R. Dillon, Aaron Doering, Janne Morton, Joseph D. Dougherty, Adish Dani, Amit Mogha and Rebecca Ouwenga. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, Research in the Teaching of English, Biological Psychiatry, BMJ Open and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact