David Newble

6.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
71 papers, 4.5k citations indexed

About

David Newble is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, David Newble has authored 71 papers receiving a total of 4.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 31 papers in Family Practice and 17 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in David Newble's work include Innovations in Medical Education (54 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (31 papers) and Radiology practices and education (15 papers). David Newble is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (54 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (31 papers) and Radiology practices and education (15 papers). David Newble collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. David Newble's co-authors include Noël Entwistle, Rufus M. Clarke, Robert Cannon, David B. Swanson, Cees van der Vleuten, Brian Jolly, Chris Roberts, R. G. Elmslie, Karen Mann and Tim Wilkinson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, British journal of surgery and British Journal of Anaesthesia.

In The Last Decade

David Newble

70 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Hit Papers

The effect of assessments... 1983 2026 1997 2011 1983 100 200 300

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
David Newble 3.2k 1.7k 1.5k 763 724 71 4.5k
Susan R. Swing 4.1k 1.2× 1.7k 1.0× 944 0.6× 1.3k 1.7× 1.1k 1.5× 48 5.6k
Joan Sargeant 3.5k 1.1× 1.7k 1.0× 1.0k 0.7× 1.8k 2.4× 906 1.3× 109 5.3k
Erik W. Driessen 4.2k 1.3× 1.9k 1.1× 2.2k 1.5× 1.2k 1.6× 1.0k 1.4× 155 5.7k
Pim W. Teunissen 4.0k 1.2× 1.5k 0.9× 1.2k 0.8× 1.6k 2.0× 617 0.9× 160 5.6k
Georges Bordage 3.7k 1.1× 2.6k 1.6× 574 0.4× 1.2k 1.5× 942 1.3× 124 5.2k
Larry D. Gruppen 4.7k 1.4× 1.9k 1.2× 1.1k 0.8× 1.9k 2.5× 877 1.2× 211 6.9k
Martin R. Fischer 2.8k 0.9× 1.2k 0.7× 1.2k 0.8× 1.2k 1.6× 474 0.7× 277 5.2k
Sally A. Santen 2.8k 0.9× 1.0k 0.6× 543 0.4× 1.2k 1.6× 634 0.9× 297 4.3k
Rachel Ellaway 2.1k 0.7× 562 0.3× 848 0.6× 1.0k 1.4× 373 0.5× 172 3.7k
Arianne Teherani 3.5k 1.1× 1.1k 0.6× 604 0.4× 1.3k 1.7× 477 0.7× 112 4.6k

Countries citing papers authored by David Newble

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Newble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Newble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Newble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Newble

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Newble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Newble. The network helps show where David Newble may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Newble

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Newble. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Newble based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Newble. David Newble is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Roberts, Chris, David Newble, Brian Jolly, Malcolm Reed, & K. K. Hampton. (2006). Assuring the quality of high-stakes undergraduate assessments of clinical competence. Medical Teacher. 28(6). 535–543. 60 indexed citations
2.
Roberts, Chris, et al.. (2005). The introduction of large class problem-based learning into an undergraduate medical curriculum: an evaluation. Medical Teacher. 27(6). 527–533. 47 indexed citations
3.
Stark, Patsy, John Ellershaw, David Newble, et al.. (2005). Student-selected components in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a multi-institutional consensus on assessable key tasks. Medical Teacher. 27(8). 720–725. 20 indexed citations
4.
Newble, David, Patsy Stark, Nigel Bax, & Mary Lawson. (2005). Developing an outcome‐focused core curriculum. Medical Education. 39(7). 680–687. 42 indexed citations
5.
Newble, David. (2004). Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical examinations. Medical Education. 38(2). 199–203. 363 indexed citations
6.
Roberts, Chris, et al.. (2003). Managing the learning environment in undergraduate medical education: the Sheffield approach. Medical Teacher. 25(3). 282–286. 11 indexed citations
7.
Roberts, Chris, David Newble, & Alan O’Rourke. (2002). Portfolio‐based assessments in medical education: are they valid and reliable for summative purposes?. Medical Education. 36(10). 899–900. 64 indexed citations
8.
Newble, David. (2001). GMC's proposals for revalidation. BMJ. 322(7282). 358–358. 7 indexed citations
9.
Wilkinson, Tim, David Newble, & Christopher Frampton. (2001). Standard setting in an objective structured clinical examination: use of global ratings of borderline performance to determine the passing score. Medical Education. 35(11). 1043–1049. 70 indexed citations
10.
Worley, Paul, Chris Silagy, David Prideaux, David Newble, & Alison Jones. (2000). The Parallel Rural Community Curriculum: an integrated clinical curriculum based in rural general practice. Medical Education. 34(7). 558–565. 178 indexed citations
11.
Newble, David, N. S. Paget, & Brian McLaren. (1999). Revalidation in Australia and New Zealand: approach of Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 319(7218). 1185–1188. 32 indexed citations
12.
Newble, David. (1997). The Good Assessment Guide. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 1 indexed citations
13.
Newble, David, Brian Jolly, & Richard Wakeford. (1994). The Certification and Recertification of Doctors: Issues in the Assessment of Clinical Competence. BMJ. 309(6961). 1096.1–1096.1. 84 indexed citations
14.
Newble, David & Robert Cannon. (1991). A handbook for teachers in universities & colleges : a guide to improving teaching methods. Kogan Page eBooks. 128 indexed citations
15.
Newble, David. (1991). The observed long‐case in clinical assessment. Medical Education. 25(5). 369–373. 40 indexed citations
16.
Newble, David, et al.. (1990). Physicians’ approaches to continuing education. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine. 20(5). 739–746. 6 indexed citations
17.
Newble, David, et al.. (1990). The approaches to learning of specialist physicians. Medical Education. 24(2). 101–109. 27 indexed citations
18.
Newble, David & David B. Swanson. (1988). Psychometric characteristics of the objective structured clinical examination. Medical Education. 22(4). 325–334. 183 indexed citations
19.
Newble, David, et al.. (1988). Towards the identification of student learning problems: the development of a diagnostic inventory. Medical Education. 22(6). 518–526. 25 indexed citations
20.
Albertyn, Lynda, et al.. (1987). The Fifth Year Undergraduate Radiology Teaching Programme At the Queen Elizabeth Hospital. Australasian Radiology. 31(3). 232–235. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026