Alan O’Rourke

1.0k citations
23 papers · 738 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Alan O’Rourke

22 papers receiving 673 citations

Peers

Alan O’Rourke
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • General Health Professions 286
  • Family Practice 24
  • Pharmacy 39
  • Health 56
  • Human-Computer Interaction 34
Replace Rowena Forsyth with:
Rowena Forsyth Australia
Eivind Engebretsen Norway
Vanessa Boudewyns United States
Kenton T. Unruh United States
William G. Rothstein United States
Heather Krieger United States
Helen W. Sullivan United States
Janet Schwartz United States
Marshall B. Kapp United States
Sandra L. Saperstein United States
Alan O’Rourke relative to Rowena Forsyth Australia Rowena Forsyth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Rowena Forsyth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alan O’Rourke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alan O’Rourke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan O’Rourke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan O’Rourke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alan O’Rourke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan O’Rourke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan O’Rourke. The network helps show where Alan O’Rourke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Alan O’Rourke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alan O’Rourke Line = papers co-authored together Alan O’Rourke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004316
2 2005155
3 200264
4
Structuring the pre-search reference interview: a useful technique for handling clinical questions.
200037
5 200631
6 200522
7 199716
8 200116
9 200814
10 199913
11 199911
12
Word Variant Identification in Old French.
19977
13 20056
14 19996
15 19996
16 19975
17 20014
18 19973
19 20002
20
EBM Notebook. Searching for evidence: principles and practice
19992

About Alan O’Rourke

Alan O’Rourke is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, History and Philosophy of Science, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 23 papers that have together received 738 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (8 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers), Organizational Change and Leadership (1 paper), Library Science and Information Literacy (1 paper) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (286 citations), Family Practice (24 citations), Pharmacy (39 citations), Health (56 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations). Alan O’Rourke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nick J. Fox, Katie Ward, Andrew Booth, Chris Roberts, David Newble, Nicholas J. Ford, Jane A. Walker, Nigel Ford, Ewan B Macdonald and Ann Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Information Science, Journal of Medical Ethics and Occupational Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact