David J. Wright

2.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
59 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

David J. Wright is a scholar working on Plant Science, Food Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, David J. Wright has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Plant Science, 15 papers in Food Science and 13 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in David J. Wright's work include Proteins in Food Systems (14 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (9 papers) and Agricultural pest management studies (8 papers). David J. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Proteins in Food Systems (14 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (9 papers) and Agricultural pest management studies (8 papers). David J. Wright collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. David J. Wright's co-authors include D. Boulter, Eric Derbyshire, Peter Wilding, Donald Boulter, J. Richard Bacon, Calvin D. Ritchie, David T. Coxon, Darrel W. Stafford, Robert D. Stevens and Daniel P. Morris and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

David J. Wright

58 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Legumin and vicilin, storage proteins of legume seeds 1976 2026 1992 2009 1976 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David J. Wright United Kingdom 19 859 780 507 487 285 59 2.1k
Nobuyuki Maruyama Japan 32 1.3k 1.5× 1.0k 1.3× 1.1k 2.2× 154 0.3× 490 1.7× 101 3.1k
Jacques‐Edouard Germond Switzerland 26 500 0.6× 258 0.3× 1.9k 3.7× 112 0.2× 216 0.8× 44 2.7k
David L. Brandon United States 22 480 0.6× 459 0.6× 596 1.2× 181 0.4× 243 0.9× 57 1.7k
Yasushi Sugimoto Japan 21 563 0.7× 184 0.2× 789 1.6× 262 0.5× 173 0.6× 80 1.7k
Jean Delcour Belgium 34 1.4k 1.6× 338 0.4× 2.1k 4.2× 85 0.2× 615 2.2× 70 3.2k
Vu Huu Thanh Japan 13 681 0.8× 832 1.1× 443 0.9× 83 0.2× 239 0.8× 17 1.5k
Kunio YAMAUCHI Japan 28 1.5k 1.8× 208 0.3× 1.5k 3.0× 359 0.7× 679 2.4× 228 2.8k
Yvan Choiset France 27 1.2k 1.4× 143 0.2× 1.2k 2.3× 207 0.4× 523 1.8× 63 2.0k
Kai Reineke Germany 29 766 0.9× 244 0.3× 604 1.2× 186 0.4× 104 0.4× 44 2.3k
Norman R. Eaton United States 15 506 0.6× 378 0.5× 1.1k 2.2× 61 0.1× 103 0.4× 25 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by David J. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Wright. The network helps show where David J. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David J. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David J. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David J. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David J. Wright. David J. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mincarelli, Laura, et al.. (2023). Single-cell gene and isoform expression analysis reveals signatures of ageing in haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Communications Biology. 6(1). 558–558. 15 indexed citations
2.
Wojtowicz, Edyta E., Jayna J. Mistry, Charlotte Hellmich, et al.. (2023). Panhematopoietic RNA barcoding enables kinetic measurements of nucleate and anucleate lineages and the activation of myeloid clones following acute platelet depletion. Genome biology. 24(1). 152–152. 3 indexed citations
3.
Wright, David J., Nicola Hall, Angela Man, et al.. (2022). Long read sequencing reveals novel isoforms and insights into splicing regulation during cell state changes. BMC Genomics. 23(1). 42–42. 21 indexed citations
4.
Wright, David J., et al.. (2014). Dysentery in World War 1: Shigella a century on. The Lancet. 384(9955). 1651–1653. 4 indexed citations
5.
Cutler, Sally J., Julie C. Scott, & David J. Wright. (2008). Phylogenetic origins of Borrelia recurrentis. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 298. 193–202. 15 indexed citations
6.
Wright, David J., et al.. (2002). DNA topoisomerase II distribution in mouse preimplantation embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 61(3). 335–346. 16 indexed citations
7.
Morris, Victor J., et al.. (1988). Pepsin treatment of chicken ovalbumin and chicken egg white and its effect upon gelation. Food Hydrocolloids. 2(1). 83–87. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hayes, L. J., David J. Wright, & L. C. Archard. (1988). Segmented Arrangement of Borrelia duttonii DNA and Location of Variant Surface Antigen Genes. Microbiology. 134(7). 1785–1793. 21 indexed citations
9.
Lambert, N., Geoffrey W. Plumb, & David J. Wright. (1987). A fast protein liquid chromatography procedure for the assessment of subunit heterogeneity of plant 11S storage globulins. Biochemical Society Transactions. 15(3). 538–539. 1 indexed citations
10.
Lambert, N., Geoffrey W. Plumb, & David J. Wright. (1987). Application of high-performance liquid chromatography to the assessment of subunit heterogeneity in plant 11S storage globulins. Journal of Chromatography A. 402. 159–172. 11 indexed citations
11.
Bacon, J. Richard, et al.. (1987). Resolution of pea legumin subunits by high-performance liquid chromatography. Analytical Biochemistry. 160(1). 202–210. 26 indexed citations
12.
Wright, David J., et al.. (1987). Foaming properties of protein solutions: Comparison of large‐scale whipping and conductimetric methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 41(4). 361–371. 26 indexed citations
13.
Wright, David J., et al.. (1984). Legume proteins in food technology. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 304(1120). 381–393. 34 indexed citations
14.
Wright, David J., et al.. (1984). Air classification of pea flour–analytical studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 35(5). 531–542. 36 indexed citations
15.
Wright, David J.. (1983). Catastrophe Theory in Management Forecasting and Decision Making. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 34(10). 935–935. 1 indexed citations
16.
Wright, David J., et al.. (1982). Quantitative variability inPisum seed globulins: its assessment and significance. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 31(4). 333–346. 48 indexed citations
17.
Beer, R. J. S. & David J. Wright. (1981). Studies on 5-benzoyl-3-isothiazolinones. Tetrahedron. 37(22). 3867–3870. 8 indexed citations
19.
Wright, David J. & Donald Boulter. (1974). Purification and subunit structure of legumin of Vicia faba L. (broad bean). Biochemical Journal. 141(2). 413–418. 101 indexed citations
20.
Wright, David J. & D. Boulter. (1972). The characterisation of vicilin during seed development in Vicia faba (L.). Planta. 105(1). 60–65. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026