Phytochemistry

32.6k papers and 905.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 32.6k papers published in Phytochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 905.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Phytochemistry usually cover Molecular Biology (19.8k papers), Plant Science (15.0k papers) and Pharmacology (3.8k papers) specifically the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (6.9k papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (5.7k papers) and Biosynthesis and Engineering of Terpenoids (3.5k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Phytochemistry are Jeffrey B. Harborne, Edwin Pahlich, Ferdinand Bohlmann, Alfred M. Mayer, J.B. Harbörne, Christine A. Williams, Peter G. Waterman, Augustin Scalbert, Margaret Roberts and Christa Zdero.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Phytochemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Phytochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Phytochemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Phytochemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Phytochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Phytochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phytochemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025