Peter Wilding

6.5k citations
97 papers · 4.1k indexed · h-index 34

Peter Wilding

91 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Peter Wilding
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Animal Science and Zoology 486
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.5k
  • Biotechnology 289
  • Food Science 305
  • Nephrology 106
Replace Hiroshi Aoki with:
Hiroshi Aoki Japan
Yan Yu China
Xin Wang China
Chii‐Wann Lin Taiwan
Bing Sun China
Kazuo Yoshida Japan
Hongtao Zhang China
Peter Jackson United Kingdom
Patrizia Simoni Italy
Paula M. Alves Portugal
Peter Wilding relative to Hiroshi Aoki Japan Hiroshi Aoki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Hiroshi Aoki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Wilding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Wilding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Wilding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Wilding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Wilding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Wilding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Wilding. The network helps show where Peter Wilding may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Wilding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Wilding Line = papers co-authored together Peter Wilding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201615
2 201616
3 20125
4 200429
5 200437
6 200346
7 2003117
8 2002110
9 199915
10 1998211
11 199892
12 199747
13 199654
14 199458
15 199410
16 199410
17 19903
18 198662
19
International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). Scientific Committee, Analytical Section. IFCC/WHO principles and recommendations on evaluation of diagnostic reagent sets used in health laboratories with limited resources. Part 3. Selection and evaluation using reference materials. General considerations.
19841
20 197717

About Peter Wilding

Peter Wilding is a scholar working on Nephrology, Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 97 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (19 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (11 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (11 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (9 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (9 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (7 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (6 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (486 citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.5k citations) and Biotechnology (289 citations). Peter Wilding has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Larry J. Kricka, David J. Wright, Paolo Fortina, Bernard J. Haverback, Nicholas J. Panaro, H. Rinderknecht, Po Ki Yuen, Alan T. Remaley, Jing Cheng and Michael L. Astion. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Chemistry, Clinica Chimica Acta, Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and Analytical Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026