David Hope
Impact in
- Family Practice top 5%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Blood transfusion and management
Papers in
-
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 9
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 13
- Medical Education and Admissions 6
- Co-authors
- Helen CameronAlan JaapTimothy C. BatesIan J. DearyDavid KluthKaren FairhurstColin DuncanB. M. Barraclough
- Journals
- Medical Teacher (5 papers)BMC Medical Education (3 papers)BMJ Open (1 paper)Medical Education (1 paper)Automation in Construction (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumAustralia
In The Last Decade
David Hope
24 papers receiving 380 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Family Practice 40
- Biochemistry 71
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 47
- Health Informatics 6
- General Dentistry 7
Countries citing papers authored by David Hope
This map shows the geographic impact of David Hope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hope more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Hope
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hope. The network helps show where David Hope may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Hope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 81 | |
| 17 | BENEFITS OF INTENSIVE MODE TEACHING TO IMPROVE STUDENT PERFORMANCE | 2013 | 9 |
| 18 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 2 |
About David Hope
David Hope is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies and Pharmacy, having authored 26 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (13 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (9 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (1 paper) and Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (40 citations), Biochemistry (71 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (47 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations) and General Dentistry (7 citations). David Hope has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Helen Cameron, Alan Jaap, Timothy C. Bates, Ian J. Deary, David Kluth, Karen Fairhurst, Colin Duncan, B. M. Barraclough, John Forbes and Charles Wallis. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, BMC Medical Education, BMJ Open, Medical Education and Automation in Construction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.