John Forbes
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Papers in
- Surgery 5
-
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications 2
- Co-authors
- Todd Sandler (1 shared paper)Jocelyn Bell (2 shared papers)Ian Gillespie (2 shared papers)Gillian Raab (2 shared papers)Andrew W. Bradbury (2 shared papers)C V Ruckley (2 shared papers)Donald J. Adam (2 shared papers)F. Gerry R. Fowkes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Medical Journal of Australia (2 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (2 papers)Recent results in cancer research (2 papers)Journal of Vascular Surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaIreland
In The Last Decade
John Forbes
34 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 184
- Cancer Research 284
- Biochemistry 74
- Surgery 423
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 27
Countries citing papers authored by John Forbes
This map shows the geographic impact of John Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Forbes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Forbes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Forbes. The network helps show where John Forbes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Forbes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 300 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 246 | |
| 3 | Lancet Oncol 10 | 2013 | 219 |
| 4 | 2015 | 204 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 163 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 101 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 84 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 36 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 17 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 16 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 14 |
About John Forbes
John Forbes is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (184 citations), Cancer Research (284 citations), Biochemistry (74 citations), Surgery (423 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (27 citations). John Forbes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Todd Sandler, Jocelyn Bell, Ian Gillespie, Gillian Raab, Andrew W. Bradbury, C V Ruckley, Donald J. Adam, F. Gerry R. Fowkes, Pam Ramsay and Timothy Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, BMJ Open, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Recent results in cancer research and Journal of Vascular Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.