John Forbes

2.5k total citations
36 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

John Forbes is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, John Forbes has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in John Forbes's work include Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers). John Forbes is often cited by papers focused on Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers). John Forbes collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. John Forbes's co-authors include Todd Sandler, Ian Gillespie, Jocelyn Bell, Andrew W. Bradbury, Donald J. Adam, Gillian Raab, C V Ruckley, F. Gerry R. Fowkes, David Zahrieh and Ivana Šestak and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

John Forbes

34 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

John Forbes
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Surgery 574
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 425
  • Cancer Research 310
  • Oncology 280
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 249
Beatriz Korc‐Grodzicki United States
Simon Noble United Kingdom
Jerome H. Liu United States
Bengt Zöller Sweden
Wen‐Chi Chou Taiwan
Elizabeth Burmeister Australia
Jung Hun Kang South Korea
Carol Conell United States
Barbara Silverman Israel
Sunni A. Barnes United States
Beatriz Korc‐Grodzicki United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John Forbes
John Forbes · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John Forbes
John Forbes · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John Forbes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Forbes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Forbes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Forbes. The network helps show where John Forbes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Forbes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Forbes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Forbes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Forbes. John Forbes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 14
3 52
4 17
5 12
6 81
7 23
8 245
9 101
10 31
11 34
12 297
13 3
14 14
15 36
16 15
17 6
18 1
19 3
20 14

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026