John M. Starr
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.1%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 95
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.2%
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing 40
- Neurology top 0.2%
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 44
-
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications 44
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications 25
-
- Birth, Development, and Health 40
-
- Health disparities and outcomes 38
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 26
John M. Starr
387 papers receiving 21.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 759
- Psychiatry and Mental health 4.9k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 998
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.6k
- Neurology 1.6k
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Starr
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Starr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Starr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Starr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Starr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Starr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Starr. The network helps show where John M. Starr may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Starr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 81 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 99 | |
| 14 | Association between psychological distress and mortality: individual participant pooled analysis of 10 prospective cohort studiesbreakdown → | 2012 | 454 |
| 15 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 61 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 129 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 32 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 113 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 242 |
About John M. Starr
John M. Starr is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 391 papers that have together received 21.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (95 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (44 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (44 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (40 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (40 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (38 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (26 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (759 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4.9k citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (998 citations). John M. Starr has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Ian J. Deary, Lawrence J. Whalley, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Alan J. Gow, Janie Corley, Mark E. Bastin, Helen Fox, Sarah E. Harris, Alison Pattie and Tom C. Russ. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurobiology of Aging, Age and Ageing, Intelligence and Psychology and Aging.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.