Stephen Cole

2.7k total citations
19 papers, 428 citations indexed

About

Stephen Cole is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Cole has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 428 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Emergency Medicine, 4 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Stephen Cole's work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers). Stephen Cole is often cited by papers focused on COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers). Stephen Cole collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Stephen Cole's co-authors include Dennis R. Williams, Brian P. Roberts, Colin R. Willis, Timothy Walsh, F. N. MacKirdy, Pam Ramsay, Caroline R. Maciver, Robert J. Lee, D. B. L. McClelland and Magnus Garrioch and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Critical Care Medicine and Emerging infectious diseases.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Cole

18 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Cole United Kingdom 11 126 117 73 50 47 19 428
Arie Shamiss Israel 7 65 0.5× 59 0.5× 8 0.1× 111 2.2× 22 0.5× 8 410
Hemlata Hemlata India 7 71 0.6× 37 0.3× 3 0.0× 46 0.9× 7 0.1× 30 380
Alireza Yaghoubi Iran 10 18 0.1× 28 0.2× 9 0.1× 9 0.2× 18 0.4× 38 432
John Foote Canada 15 34 0.3× 13 0.1× 9 0.1× 67 1.3× 9 0.2× 27 608
Mark Nelson United Kingdom 11 41 0.3× 26 0.2× 6 0.1× 64 1.3× 26 0.6× 52 378
Soumya Sarkar India 11 4 0.0× 46 0.4× 41 0.6× 6 0.1× 20 0.4× 43 443
Janelle Rekman Canada 12 20 0.2× 26 0.2× 5 0.1× 3 0.1× 38 0.8× 22 548
Shuhui Li United States 9 40 0.3× 26 0.2× 3 0.0× 52 1.0× 2 0.0× 17 312
B.M. Duncan Australia 8 11 0.1× 14 0.1× 2 0.0× 52 1.0× 48 1.0× 20 382
Michael R. Alexander United States 14 5 0.0× 36 0.3× 4 0.1× 6 0.1× 23 0.5× 31 493

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Cole. The network helps show where Stephen Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Cole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Cole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Cole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Cole. Stephen Cole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Liberati, Elisa Giulia, Sarah Kelly, Annabel Price, et al.. (2025). Diagnostic inequalities relating to physical healthcare among people with mental health conditions: a systematic review. EClinicalMedicine. 80. 103026–103026. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rattray, Janice, Jordan Miller, Beth Pollard, et al.. (2024). A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 13(23). 1–32. 1 indexed citations
3.
Miller, Jordan, Ben Young, Janice Rattray, et al.. (2023). “Like fighting a fire with a water pistol”: A qualitative study of the work experiences of critical care nurses during the COVID ‐19 pandemic. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 80(1). 237–251. 10 indexed citations
4.
Rattray, Janice, Alastair Hull, Pam Ramsay, et al.. (2021). Work-related stress: the impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 11(7). e051326–e051326. 18 indexed citations
5.
Donaldson, Lindsay, et al.. (2019). Intensive care unit occupancy and premature discharge rates: A cohort study assessing the reporting of quality indicators. Journal of Critical Care. 55. 100–107. 7 indexed citations
7.
Walsh, Timothy, Kalliopi Kydonaki, Robert J. Lee, et al.. (2015). Development of Process Control Methodology for Tracking the Quality and Safety of Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Management in Critical Care Units. Critical Care Medicine. 44(3). 564–574. 6 indexed citations
8.
Reilly, J., J. McCoubrey, Stephen Cole, Ayesha Khan, & Brian Cook. (2014). Integrating intensive care unit (ICU) surveillance into an ICU clinical care electronic system. Journal of Hospital Infection. 89(4). 271–275. 4 indexed citations
9.
Booth, Malcolm, Lindsay Donaldson, Xizhong Cui, et al.. (2014). ConfirmedBacillus anthracisInfection among Persons Who Inject Drugs, Scotland, 2009–2010. Emerging infectious diseases. 20(9). 1452–1463. 26 indexed citations
10.
Chalmers, James D., et al.. (2014). Renal replacement therapy in Scottish critical care units: A national audit of practices. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 16(1). 45–51. 1 indexed citations
11.
Cole, Stephen, Nicholas Barrett, Guy Glover, et al.. (2014). Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal as an Alternative to Endotracheal Intubation for Non-Invasive Ventilation Failure in Acute Exacerbation of COPD. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 15(4). 344–346. 8 indexed citations
12.
Walsh, Timothy, Julia Boyd, Douglas Watson, et al.. (2013). Restrictive Versus Liberal Transfusion Strategies for Older Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients. Critical Care Medicine. 41(10). 2354–2363. 81 indexed citations
13.
Cole, Stephen, et al.. (2005). Preoperative esophageal manometry does not predict postoperative dysphagia following anti-reflux surgery. Diseases of the Esophagus. 18(1). 51–56. 15 indexed citations
14.
Walsh, Timothy, Robert J. Lee, Caroline R. Maciver, et al.. (2005). Anemia during and at discharge from intensive care: the impact of restrictive blood transfusion practice. Intensive Care Medicine. 32(1). 100–109. 69 indexed citations
15.
Bolton, Patrick, et al.. (2001). Ease of laryngeal passage during fibreoptic intubation: a comparison of three endotracheal tubes. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 45(5). 624–626. 13 indexed citations
16.
Williams, Dennis R. & Stephen Cole. (1998). Ventricular fibrillation following butane gas inhalation. Resuscitation. 37(1). 43–45. 38 indexed citations
17.
Cole, Stephen, et al.. (1994). Rapid resolution following chemotherapy of Broca's dysphasia due to recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 8(2). 205–208.
18.
Cole, Stephen, et al.. (1991). Radical chain reduction of alkyl halides, dialkyl sulphides and O-alkyl S-methyl dithiocarbonates to alkanes by trialkylsilanes. Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1. 103–103. 77 indexed citations
19.
Cole, Stephen. (1967). The Maillard Reaction in Food Products Carbon Dioxide Production. Journal of Food Science. 32(3). 245–250. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026