David Cray

2.0k total citations
38 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

David Cray is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, David Cray has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Strategy and Management, 11 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 5 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in David Cray's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (11 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (9 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers). David Cray is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (11 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (9 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers). David Cray collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. David Cray's co-authors include Geoffrey R. Mallory, David C. Wilson, David J. Hickson, Richard J. Butler, Louise A. Heslop, Meryl Reis Louis, Gale Miller, Irene R. R. Lu, Jane Hannaway and Richard J. Butler and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Administrative Science Quarterly and Journal of International Business Studies.

In The Last Decade

David Cray

38 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Cray Canada 17 611 402 290 206 201 38 1.4k
Robert S. Dooley United States 15 614 1.0× 502 1.2× 277 1.0× 154 0.7× 114 0.6× 17 1.3k
Richard J. Butler United Kingdom 19 619 1.0× 421 1.0× 303 1.0× 220 1.1× 231 1.1× 31 1.4k
Roger L. M. Dunbar United States 21 616 1.0× 558 1.4× 214 0.7× 298 1.4× 169 0.8× 48 1.5k
Fredric William Swierczek Thailand 20 509 0.8× 390 1.0× 174 0.6× 235 1.1× 139 0.7× 60 1.3k
John McMackin Ireland 9 576 0.9× 502 1.2× 325 1.1× 286 1.4× 92 0.5× 15 1.4k
Charles I. Stubbart United States 12 985 1.6× 661 1.6× 223 0.8× 180 0.9× 305 1.5× 20 1.8k
Steven S. Lui Australia 16 897 1.5× 580 1.4× 292 1.0× 426 2.1× 196 1.0× 28 1.7k
Chris P. Long United States 12 733 1.2× 457 1.1× 228 0.8× 309 1.5× 145 0.7× 26 1.4k
Guje Sevón Sweden 10 406 0.7× 577 1.4× 394 1.4× 179 0.9× 94 0.5× 17 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by David Cray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Cray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Cray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Cray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Cray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Cray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Cray. The network helps show where David Cray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Cray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Cray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Cray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Cray. David Cray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McKay, Ruth, et al.. (2018). We're not in Kansas anymore: Academic honesty in an international business program. The International Journal of Management Education. 17(1). 1–14. 11 indexed citations
2.
Cray, David, et al.. (2017). Strategic decision making in the arts: topics and processes. Figshare. 1–28. 1 indexed citations
3.
Cray, David, et al.. (2013). Validating and Enhancing a Strategy Transformation Model Using Case Study. Global business and management research. 5(1). 32. 2 indexed citations
4.
Doyle, James D., et al.. (2012). Trust building in wine blogs: a content analysis. International Journal of Wine Business Research. 24(3). 196–218. 5 indexed citations
5.
Cray, David, et al.. (2011). Strategic Decision Making in Arts Organizations. The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society. 41(2). 84–102. 14 indexed citations
6.
Cray, David, et al.. (2010). Public‐sector strategy formulation. Canadian Public Administration. 53(4). 453–466. 8 indexed citations
7.
Heslop, Louise A., et al.. (2010). Cue incongruity in wine personality formation and purchasing. International Journal of Wine Business Research. 22(3). 288–307. 28 indexed citations
8.
Heslop, Louise A., et al.. (2009). Brand and Country-of-Origin Effects in Wine Decision Making: Is Incongruity a Problem in a Wine World Turned Upside Down?. 30(3). 7 indexed citations
9.
Grant, Gerald, et al.. (2008). Enterprise Information Systems and Strategic Flexibility. 46. 402–402. 25 indexed citations
10.
Cray, David, et al.. (2007). Managing the Arts: Leadership and Decision Making under Dual Rationalities. The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society. 36(4). 295–313. 40 indexed citations
11.
Kumar, Vinod, et al.. (2002). Key determinants of the mode of international technology transfer: evidence from India and Turkey. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation. 1(1/2). 122–122. 2 indexed citations
12.
Kersten, Gregory E. & David Cray. (1996). Perspectives on representation and analysis of negotiation: Towards cognitive support systems. Group Decision and Negotiation. 5(4-6). 433–467. 3 indexed citations
13.
Cray, David, George H. Haines, & Geoffrey R. Mallory. (1994). Programmed Strategic Decision Making: The View From Mintzberg's Window1. British Journal of Management. 5(3). 191–204. 4 indexed citations
14.
Kersten, Gregory E., et al.. (1991). An analytic basis for decision support in negotiations. Naval Research Logistics (NRL). 38(5). 743–761. 18 indexed citations
15.
Hickson, David J., et al.. (1988). Top Decisions: Strategic Decision-Making in Organizations.. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 39(7). 697–697. 3 indexed citations
16.
Cray, David, Geoffrey R. Mallory, Richard J. Butler, David J. Hickson, & David C. Wilson. (1988). SPORADIC, FLUID AND CONSTRICTED PROCESSES: THREE TYPES OF STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS[1]. Journal of Management Studies. 25(1). 13–39. 49 indexed citations
17.
Louis, Meryl Reis, David J. Hickson, Richard J. Butler, et al.. (1987). Top Decisions: Strategic Decision-Making in Organizations.. Administrative Science Quarterly. 32(4). 627–627. 272 indexed citations
18.
Cray, David. (1984). Control and Coordination in Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies. 15(2). 85–98. 141 indexed citations
19.
Mallory, Geoffrey R., Richard J. Butler, David Cray, David J. Hickson, & David C. Wilson. (1983). IMPLANTED DECISION‐MAKING: AMERICAN OWNED FIRMS IN BRITAIN [I]. Journal of Management Studies. 20(2). 191–211. 21 indexed citations
20.
Wilson, David C., Richard J. Butler, David Cray, David J. Hickson, & Geoffrey R. Mallory. (1982). THE LIMITS OF TRADE UNION POWER IN ORGANISATIONAL DECISIONMAKING. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 20(3). 322–341. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026