Ching-Mei Tseng

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Ching-Mei Tseng is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ching-Mei Tseng has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Education, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ching-Mei Tseng's work include Online Learning and Analytics (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers). Ching-Mei Tseng is often cited by papers focused on Online Learning and Analytics (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers). Ching-Mei Tseng collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and South Korea. Ching-Mei Tseng's co-authors include Johnmarshall Reeve, Shih‐Chung Kang, Yifen Li, Tzong-Hann Wu, Feng Wu, Ci‐Jyun Liang, William J. Therrien, Brian Hand and Jonté Taylor and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Educational Psychology, Motivation and Emotion and Educational Technology & Society.

In The Last Decade

Ching-Mei Tseng

8 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during ... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ching-Mei Tseng Taiwan 5 592 422 338 177 119 8 1.2k
Adar Ben‐Eliyahu Israel 17 562 0.9× 516 1.2× 444 1.3× 357 2.0× 166 1.4× 31 1.3k
Lisa Linnenbrink‐Garcia United States 8 655 1.1× 607 1.4× 366 1.1× 596 3.4× 164 1.4× 9 1.5k
Jenefer Husman United States 12 500 0.8× 335 0.8× 297 0.9× 388 2.2× 59 0.5× 37 1.1k
Candice Stefanou United States 9 536 0.9× 181 0.4× 270 0.8× 139 0.8× 50 0.4× 23 832
Lisa Bardach Germany 21 668 1.1× 498 1.2× 163 0.5× 420 2.4× 111 0.9× 61 1.2k
Jill Scevak Australia 16 612 1.0× 115 0.3× 262 0.8× 102 0.6× 83 0.7× 38 1.1k
Jean‐Louis Berger Switzerland 16 592 1.0× 296 0.7× 302 0.9× 208 1.2× 53 0.4× 56 984
Sigal Eden Israel 18 414 0.7× 402 1.0× 199 0.6× 51 0.3× 116 1.0× 49 975
Shaoying Gong China 18 384 0.6× 282 0.7× 231 0.7× 243 1.4× 134 1.1× 39 828
Vittorio Busato Netherlands 6 394 0.7× 344 0.8× 349 1.0× 283 1.6× 206 1.7× 12 960

Countries citing papers authored by Ching-Mei Tseng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching-Mei Tseng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching-Mei Tseng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching-Mei Tseng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching-Mei Tseng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching-Mei Tseng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching-Mei Tseng. The network helps show where Ching-Mei Tseng may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ching-Mei Tseng

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ching-Mei Tseng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ching-Mei Tseng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ching-Mei Tseng. Ching-Mei Tseng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Tseng, Ching-Mei, et al.. (2018). Using Exaggerated Feedback in a Virtual Reality Environment to Enhance Behavior Intention of Water-Conservation.. Educational Technology & Society. 21(4). 187–203. 43 indexed citations
2.
Taylor, Jonté, et al.. (2018). Using Argument-based Science Inquiry to Improve Science Achievement for Students with Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms. RIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology). 21(1). 1–14. 10 indexed citations
3.
Li, Yifen, Ching-Mei Tseng, & Shih‐Chung Kang. (2017). A New Learning Model, Guided Soft Classroom, Integrating MOOCs into Conventional Classrooms for University Students. 57. 59–67. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wu, Tzong-Hann, Feng Wu, Ci‐Jyun Liang, et al.. (2017). A virtual reality tool for training in global engineering collaboration. Universal Access in the Information Society. 18(2). 243–255. 58 indexed citations
5.
Kang, Shih‐Chung, Yifen Li, & Ching-Mei Tseng. (2016). The Effect of Soft Classroom: A New Learning Environment Integrating MOOCs into Conventional Classrooms for College Students. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 1 indexed citations
6.
Tseng, Ching-Mei, et al.. (2015). Generating Testable Questions in the Science Classroom. The American Biology Teacher. 77(3). 166–169. 1 indexed citations
7.
Reeve, Johnmarshall & Ching-Mei Tseng. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 36(4). 257–267. 946 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Reeve, Johnmarshall & Ching-Mei Tseng. (2011). Cortisol reactivity to a teacher’s motivating style: the biology of being controlled versus supporting autonomy. Motivation and Emotion. 35(1). 63–74. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026