Cecilia Kirk

993 total citations
19 papers, 661 citations indexed

About

Cecilia Kirk is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Cecilia Kirk has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 661 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Cecilia Kirk's work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (10 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (9 papers). Cecilia Kirk is often cited by papers focused on Phonetics and Phonology Research (10 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (9 papers). Cecilia Kirk collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and France. Cecilia Kirk's co-authors include Katherine Demuth, Gail Gillon, John Kingston, Randy L. Diehl, Marilyn A. Nippold, James L. Morgan, Brigid McNeill, Sharon Peperkamp, Katherine S. White and Tim Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Cognition and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

Cecilia Kirk

19 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cecilia Kirk United States 17 460 313 136 120 102 19 661
Barbara Williams Hodson United States 16 777 1.7× 356 1.1× 200 1.5× 74 0.6× 66 0.6× 41 908
Barbara May Bernhardt Canada 18 767 1.7× 694 2.2× 222 1.6× 38 0.3× 174 1.7× 64 1.1k
David Snow United States 16 508 1.1× 352 1.1× 205 1.5× 35 0.3× 79 0.8× 34 641
Ferenc Bunta United States 14 531 1.2× 432 1.4× 220 1.6× 45 0.4× 91 0.9× 39 837
Nan Xu Rattanasone Australia 13 340 0.7× 285 0.9× 253 1.9× 33 0.3× 48 0.5× 54 573
Andrea A. N. MacLeod Canada 15 430 0.9× 227 0.7× 158 1.2× 55 0.5× 47 0.5× 50 625
John E. Bernthal United States 12 863 1.9× 611 2.0× 248 1.8× 44 0.4× 146 1.4× 22 1.1k
Ann Bosma Smit United States 12 861 1.9× 664 2.1× 239 1.8× 28 0.2× 157 1.5× 14 1.1k
Helena Bolli Mota Brazil 16 700 1.5× 210 0.7× 117 0.9× 124 1.0× 46 0.5× 112 864
Yuriko Oshima‐Takane Canada 10 419 0.9× 75 0.2× 113 0.8× 63 0.5× 65 0.6× 29 530

Countries citing papers authored by Cecilia Kirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cecilia Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecilia Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecilia Kirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cecilia Kirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecilia Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecilia Kirk. The network helps show where Cecilia Kirk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cecilia Kirk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cecilia Kirk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cecilia Kirk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cecilia Kirk. Cecilia Kirk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Sohlberg, McKay Moore, et al.. (2015). Evaluation of use of reading comprehension strategies to improve reading comprehension of adult college students with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 26(2). 161–190. 23 indexed citations
2.
Nippold, Marilyn A., et al.. (2015). Critical Thinking About Fables: Examining Language Production and Comprehension in Adolescents. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 58(2). 325–335. 33 indexed citations
3.
Kirk, Cecilia, et al.. (2014). A Psychometric Review of Norm-Referenced Tests Used to Assess Phonological Error Patterns. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools. 45(4). 365–377. 22 indexed citations
4.
Kirk, Cecilia, et al.. (2014). Content Coverage of Single-Word Tests Used to Assess Common Phonological Error Patterns. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools. 46(1). 14–29. 19 indexed citations
5.
McNeill, Brigid & Cecilia Kirk. (2013). Theoretical beliefs and instructional practices used for teaching spelling in elementary classrooms. Reading and Writing. 27(3). 535–554. 25 indexed citations
6.
Nippold, Marilyn A., et al.. (2013). Conversational and Narrative Speaking in Adolescents: Examining the Use of Complex Syntax. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 57(3). 876–886. 65 indexed citations
7.
Moran, Catherine, et al.. (2012). Spoken Persuasive Discourse Abilities of Adolescents With Acquired Brain Injury. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools. 43(3). 264–275. 19 indexed citations
8.
Borrie, Stephanie A., Megan J. McAuliffe, Julie Liss, et al.. (2011). Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech. Language and Cognitive Processes. 27(7-8). 1039–1055. 50 indexed citations
9.
Kirk, Cecilia & Gail Gillon. (2009). Integrated Morphological Awareness Intervention as a Tool for Improving Literacy. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools. 40(3). 341–351. 82 indexed citations
10.
White, Katherine S., Sharon Peperkamp, Cecilia Kirk, & James L. Morgan. (2008). Rapid acquisition of phonological alternations by infants. Cognition. 107(1). 238–265. 50 indexed citations
11.
Kirk, Cecilia. (2008). Substitution Errors in the Production of Word-Initial and Word-Final Consonant Clusters. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 51(1). 35–48. 23 indexed citations
12.
Kingston, John, et al.. (2007). On the internal perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrast. Journal of Phonetics. 36(1). 28–54. 66 indexed citations
13.
Kirk, Cecilia & Gail Gillon. (2007). Longitudinal Effects of Phonological Awareness Intervention on Morphological Awareness in Children With Speech Impairment. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools. 38(4). 342–352. 33 indexed citations
14.
Kirk, Cecilia & Katherine Demuth. (2006). Accounting for Variability in 2-Year-Olds' Production of Coda Consonants. Language Learning and Development. 2(2). 97–118. 33 indexed citations
15.
Kirk, Cecilia & Katherine Demuth. (2005). Asymmetries in the acquisition of word-initial and word-final consonant clusters. Journal of Child Language. 32(4). 709–734. 69 indexed citations
16.
Demuth, Katherine, et al.. (2004). Markedness versus frequency effects in coda acquisition. 565–576. 19 indexed citations
17.
Kirk, Cecilia & Katherine Demuth. (2003). Onset/coda asymmetries in the acquisition of clusters. 437–448. 25 indexed citations
18.
Kirk, Cecilia. (2001). Phonological constraints on the segmentation of continuous speech. Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst). 4 indexed citations
19.
Kingston, John & Cecilia Kirk. (1997). Must sine wave analogs be perceived as implicit speech to be perceived categorically?. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 102(5_Supplement). 3091–3091. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026