Stephen Fickas

4.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
91 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Stephen Fickas is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Software. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Fickas has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 32 papers in Information Systems and 20 papers in Software. Recurrent topics in Stephen Fickas's work include Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (32 papers), Software Engineering Research (19 papers) and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (12 papers). Stephen Fickas is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (32 papers), Software Engineering Research (19 papers) and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (12 papers). Stephen Fickas collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Stephen Fickas's co-authors include Axel van Lamsweerde, Martin S. Feather, McKay Moore Sohlberg, Christophe Ponsard, Alistair Sutcliffe, Gerd Kortuem, Zary Segall, Björn Helm, Bonnie Todis and Philip London and has published in prestigious journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Computers & Education and IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Fickas

87 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

Goal-directed requirements acquisition 1993 2026 2004 2015 1993 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Fickas United States 24 2.0k 1.7k 631 588 373 91 2.9k
Pete Sawyer United Kingdom 32 2.0k 1.0× 2.4k 1.4× 662 1.0× 560 1.0× 443 1.2× 142 3.9k
Carl K. Chang United States 21 614 0.3× 1.1k 0.6× 454 0.7× 411 0.7× 164 0.4× 161 1.9k
I. V. Ramakrishnan United States 25 878 0.4× 753 0.4× 359 0.6× 61 0.1× 119 0.3× 188 2.2k
Carlos Lucena Brazil 23 1.4k 0.7× 1.5k 0.9× 611 1.0× 440 0.7× 260 0.7× 319 2.5k
Rachel Harrison United Kingdom 21 639 0.3× 1.6k 0.9× 283 0.4× 745 1.3× 86 0.2× 108 2.2k
Fabio Paternò Italy 32 925 0.5× 1.0k 0.6× 384 0.6× 735 1.3× 243 0.7× 257 4.0k
Bernd Bruegge Germany 28 805 0.4× 1.7k 1.0× 521 0.8× 363 0.6× 163 0.4× 187 2.9k
Massimo Mecella Italy 25 762 0.4× 1.0k 0.6× 602 1.0× 39 0.1× 727 1.9× 189 2.1k
Bonnie E. John United States 33 942 0.5× 976 0.6× 149 0.2× 162 0.3× 120 0.3× 124 3.7k
Jean Vanderdonckt Belgium 31 856 0.4× 1.1k 0.7× 285 0.5× 412 0.7× 274 0.7× 341 3.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Fickas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Fickas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Fickas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Fickas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Fickas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Fickas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Fickas. The network helps show where Stephen Fickas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Fickas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Fickas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Fickas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Fickas. Stephen Fickas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fickas, Stephen, et al.. (2024). A Survey of Open Source Software Repositories in the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Laboratories. Computing in Science & Engineering. 26(3). 60–67. 1 indexed citations
2.
Sohlberg, McKay Moore, et al.. (2015). Evaluation of use of reading comprehension strategies to improve reading comprehension of adult college students with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 26(2). 161–190. 23 indexed citations
3.
Giorgini, Paolo, et al.. (2011). Detecting Conflicts between Functional and Security Requirements with Secure Tropos: John Rusnak and the Allied Irish Bank. 337–362. 6 indexed citations
4.
Giorgini, Paolo, et al.. (2011). Secure Tropos: Extending i* and Tropos to Model Security Throughout the Development Process. 363–402. 1 indexed citations
5.
Sohlberg, McKay Moore, et al.. (2010). When directions fail: Investigation of getting lost behaviour in adults with acquired brain injury. Brain Injury. 24(3). 550–559. 13 indexed citations
6.
Sohlberg, McKay Moore, et al.. (2010). Phase I evaluation of the television assisted prompting system to increase completion of home exercises among stroke survivors. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 6(5). 440–452. 12 indexed citations
7.
Sohlberg, McKay Moore, et al.. (2008). Validation of the Activities of Community Transportation model for individuals with cognitive impairments. Disability and Rehabilitation. 31(11). 887–897. 12 indexed citations
8.
Kortuem, Gerd, Stephen Fickas, & Zary Segall. (2007). Architectural Issues in Supporting Ad-hoc Collaboration with Wearable Computers. 2 indexed citations
9.
Cheng, Betty H. C., Rogério de Lemos, Stephen Fickas, et al.. (2006). Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Self-adaptation and self-managing systems. International Conference on Software Engineering. 4 indexed citations
10.
Todis, Bonnie, et al.. (2004). Making electronic mail accessible: Perspectives of people with acquired cognitive impairments, caregivers and professionals. Brain Injury. 19(6). 389–401. 41 indexed citations
11.
Sohlberg, McKay Moore, et al.. (2003). A pilot study exploring electronic (or e-mail) mail in users with acquired cognitive-linguistic impairments. Brain Injury. 17(7). 609–629. 39 indexed citations
12.
Fickas, Stephen, et al.. (2002). Goal-directed concept acquisition in requirements elicitation. 14–21. 55 indexed citations
13.
Feather, Martin S., Stephen Fickas, Axel van Lamsweerde, & Christophe Ponsard. (1998). Reconciling system requirements and runtime behavior. 50–59. 123 indexed citations
14.
Kortuem, Gerd, Stephen Fickas, & Zary Segall. (1997). On-Demand Delivery of Software in Mobile Environments. 2 indexed citations
15.
Fickas, Stephen & Peter G. Selfridge. (1994). Software engineering and artificial intelligence. International Conference on Software Engineering. 353–354. 1 indexed citations
16.
Lamsweerde, Axel van, et al.. (1993). Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming. 20(1-2). 3–50. 1170 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Downing, Keith L. & Stephen Fickas. (1991). Specification criticism via goal-directed envisionment. 22–30. 2 indexed citations
18.
Fickas, Stephen, et al.. (1988). Being suspicious: critiquing problem specifications. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 19–24. 21 indexed citations
19.
Fickas, Stephen. (1985). Design issues in a Rule-Based System. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 20(7). 208–215. 3 indexed citations
20.
Erman, Lee D., Philip London, & Stephen Fickas. (1981). The design and an example use of Hearsay-III. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 409–415. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026