Sharon Peperkamp

4.7k total citations
77 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Sharon Peperkamp is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Sharon Peperkamp has authored 77 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 37 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 23 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Sharon Peperkamp's work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (56 papers), Language Development and Disorders (30 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (19 papers). Sharon Peperkamp is often cited by papers focused on Phonetics and Phonology Research (56 papers), Language Development and Disorders (30 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (19 papers). Sharon Peperkamp collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Netherlands. Sharon Peperkamp's co-authors include Emmanuel Dupoux, Núria Sebastián‐Gallés, Inga Vendelin, Anne Christophe, Katrin Skoruppa, Shiri Lev‐Ari, Eduardo Navarrete, Alexander Martin, Jacques Mehler and Christophe Pallier and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Sharon Peperkamp

73 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sharon Peperkamp France 25 1.9k 1.1k 698 654 555 77 2.4k
Alice Turk United Kingdom 23 2.2k 1.2× 803 0.7× 1.1k 1.6× 694 1.1× 1.1k 1.9× 64 2.8k
Joan A. Sereno United States 27 1.8k 1.0× 980 0.9× 679 1.0× 1.1k 1.7× 603 1.1× 88 2.4k
Holger Mitterer Netherlands 31 2.1k 1.1× 896 0.8× 877 1.3× 1.1k 1.7× 656 1.2× 98 2.7k
Delphine Dahan United States 19 1.9k 1.0× 1.2k 1.1× 393 0.6× 1.6k 2.5× 732 1.3× 30 2.8k
Paola Escudero Australia 31 2.3k 1.2× 1.1k 1.0× 1.3k 1.8× 717 1.1× 841 1.5× 141 2.9k
Pierre Hallé France 19 1.3k 0.7× 1.1k 0.9× 464 0.7× 610 0.9× 380 0.7× 60 1.9k
Cynthia M. Connine United States 27 1.8k 1.0× 1.1k 0.9× 468 0.7× 1.1k 1.7× 665 1.2× 51 2.4k
William J. Idsardi United States 22 1.0k 0.5× 406 0.4× 429 0.6× 813 1.2× 280 0.5× 65 1.8k
Stefanie Shattuck‐Hufnagel United States 26 3.0k 1.6× 1.0k 0.9× 1.3k 1.9× 908 1.4× 1.5k 2.7× 144 3.8k
Carlos Gussenhoven Netherlands 26 2.9k 1.5× 566 0.5× 1.6k 2.3× 537 0.8× 1.1k 2.0× 116 3.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Sharon Peperkamp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sharon Peperkamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sharon Peperkamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sharon Peperkamp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sharon Peperkamp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sharon Peperkamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sharon Peperkamp. The network helps show where Sharon Peperkamp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sharon Peperkamp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sharon Peperkamp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sharon Peperkamp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sharon Peperkamp. Sharon Peperkamp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Peperkamp, Sharon, et al.. (2023). Lasting Stress 'Deafness' After Auditory Training: French Listeners Revisited. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository.
2.
Peperkamp, Sharon, et al.. (2019). Perceptual deletion and asymmetric lexical access in second language learners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 145(1). EL13–EL18. 10 indexed citations
3.
Sundara, Megha, et al.. (2018). Young infants’ discrimination of subtle phonetic contrasts. Cognition. 178. 57–66. 19 indexed citations
4.
Yu, Shi, et al.. (2017). Predicting Epenthetic Vowel Quality from Acoustics. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 596–600. 2 indexed citations
5.
Fort, Mathilde, et al.. (2017). A novel form of perceptual attunement: Context-dependent perception of a native contrast in 14-month-old infants. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 26. 45–51. 6 indexed citations
6.
Minagawa, Yasuyo, et al.. (2017). Which epenthetic vowel? Phonetic categories versus acoustic detail in perceptual vowel epenthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 142(2). EL211–EL217. 3 indexed citations
7.
Peperkamp, Sharon, et al.. (2016). What infants know about the unsaid: Phonological categorization in the absence of auditory input. Cognition. 152. 53–60. 6 indexed citations
8.
Zuraw, Kie & Sharon Peperkamp. (2015). Aspiration and the gradient structure of English prefixed words.. ICPhS. 6 indexed citations
9.
Sun, Yue, Martine Adda‐Decker, Leonardo S. Barbosa, et al.. (2015). Complex linguistic rules modulate early auditory brain responses. Brain and Language. 149. 55–65. 11 indexed citations
10.
Sun, Yue & Sharon Peperkamp. (2015). The role of speech production in phonological decoding during visual word recognition: evidence from phonotactic repair. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 31(3). 391–403. 2 indexed citations
11.
Fort, Mathilde, Alexa Weiß, Alexander Martin, & Sharon Peperkamp. (2013). Looking for the bouba-kiki effect in prelexical infants.. AVSP. 71–76. 24 indexed citations
12.
Martin, Andrew T., Sharon Peperkamp, & Emmanuel Dupoux. (2012). Learning Phonemes With a Proto‐Lexicon. Cognitive Science. 37(1). 103–124. 37 indexed citations
13.
Skoruppa, Katrin, Nivedita Mani, & Sharon Peperkamp. (2012). Toddlers’ Processing of Phonological Alternations: Early Compensation for Assimilation in English and French. Child Development. 84(1). 313–330. 12 indexed citations
14.
Martin, Andrew T., et al.. (2012). (Non)words, (non)words, (non)words: evidence for a protolexicon during the first year of life. Developmental Science. 16(1). 24–34. 65 indexed citations
15.
Dupoux, Emmanuel, Sharon Peperkamp, & Núria Sebastián‐Gallés. (2009). Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress ‘deafness’ in simultaneous French–Spanish bilinguals. Cognition. 114(2). 266–275. 87 indexed citations
16.
Skoruppa, Katrin, Ferrán Pons, Anne Christophe, et al.. (2009). Language‐specific stress perception by 9‐month‐old French and Spanish infants. Developmental Science. 12(6). 914–919. 76 indexed citations
17.
White, Katherine S., Sharon Peperkamp, Cecilia Kirk, & James L. Morgan. (2008). Rapid acquisition of phonological alternations by infants. Cognition. 107(1). 238–265. 50 indexed citations
18.
Peperkamp, Sharon & Emmanuel Dupoux. (2006). Learning the mapping from surface to underlying representations in an artificial language. 97(12). 835–41. 35 indexed citations
19.
Peperkamp, Sharon. (2004). Lexical Exceptions in Stress Systems: Arguments from Early Language Acquisition and Adult Speech Perception. Language. 80(1). 98–126. 22 indexed citations
20.
Peperkamp, Sharon. (2004). A Psycholinguistic Theory of Loanword Adaptations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 30(1). 341–341. 66 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026