Stephanie A. Borrie

56 papers receiving 888 citations

Peers

Stephanie A. Borrie
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 545
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 483
  • Physiology 303
  • Signal Processing 196
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 181
Replace Nancy S. McGarr with:
Nancy S. McGarr United States
Marios Fourakis United States
Michael Blomgren United States
Stephanie M. Spitzer United States
Peter Flipsen United States
Rajka Smiljanić United States
Nigel Hewlett United Kingdom
Melissa M. Baese‐Berk United States
Jessica A. Barlow United States
Steven B. Chin United States
Stephanie A. Borrie relative to Nancy S. McGarr United States Nancy S. McGarr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.4×
Nancy S. McGarr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie A. Borrie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie A. Borrie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie A. Borrie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie A. Borrie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie A. Borrie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie A. Borrie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie A. Borrie. The network helps show where Stephanie A. Borrie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie A. Borrie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie A. Borrie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie A. Borrie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie A. Borrie. Stephanie A. Borrie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 2
5 1
6 0
7 7
8 17
9 6
10 3
11 5
12 54
13 29
14 17
15 58
16
Individual differences in perception of unfamiliar speech.
4
17 32
18 23
19 50
20
Consideration of the listener in the assessment and treatment of dysarthria
6

About Stephanie A. Borrie

Stephanie A. Borrie is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Signal Processing, having authored 61 papers that have together received 906 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (42 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (30 papers) and Voice and Speech Disorders (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (545 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (483 citations) and Linguistics and Language (94 citations). Stephanie A. Borrie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Tyson S. Barrett, Kaitlin L. Lansford, Julie Liss, Megan J. McAuliffe, Melissa M. Baese‐Berk, Tessa Bent, Sarah E. Yoho, Kristin J. Van Engen, Tim Anderson and Greg A. O’Beirne. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026