Carole Pemberton

17 total papers · 852 total citations
15 papers, 579 citations indexed

About

Carole Pemberton is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Carole Pemberton has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 579 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Gender Studies, 6 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 3 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Carole Pemberton's work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring (4 papers). Carole Pemberton is often cited by papers focused on Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring (4 papers). Carole Pemberton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Carole Pemberton's co-authors include Peter Herriot, Cheryl J. Travers, Paul R. Jackson and Patrick Gibbons and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Relations, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology and British Journal of Management.

In The Last Decade

Carole Pemberton

14 papers receiving 487 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Carole Pemberton 384 146 115 112 93 15 579
Jennifer Hartwell 307 0.8× 205 1.4× 156 1.4× 93 0.8× 115 1.2× 10 689
Dale E. Fitzgibbons 285 0.7× 77 0.5× 165 1.4× 56 0.5× 51 0.5× 16 608
Maria Simosi 355 0.9× 76 0.5× 137 1.2× 56 0.5× 56 0.6× 19 661
Hilla Peretz 264 0.7× 92 0.6× 135 1.2× 38 0.3× 69 0.7× 22 531
Susanne Beijer 465 1.2× 52 0.4× 149 1.3× 165 1.5× 66 0.7× 16 615
Patricia Hind 274 0.7× 88 0.6× 83 0.7× 114 1.0× 46 0.5× 11 596
James G. Goodale 314 0.8× 79 0.5× 148 1.3× 80 0.7× 59 0.6× 15 633
Beverly J. DeMarr 316 0.8× 108 0.7× 286 2.5× 74 0.7× 129 1.4× 7 644
Helen Francis 390 1.0× 69 0.5× 101 0.9× 64 0.6× 36 0.4× 22 541
Kang Yang Trevor Yu 459 1.2× 68 0.5× 166 1.4× 45 0.4× 101 1.1× 30 693

Countries citing papers authored by Carole Pemberton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carole Pemberton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carole Pemberton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carole Pemberton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carole Pemberton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carole Pemberton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carole Pemberton. The network helps show where Carole Pemberton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carole Pemberton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carole Pemberton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carole Pemberton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carole Pemberton. Carole Pemberton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026