Bruno D’Amore

449 total citations
86 papers, 243 citations indexed

About

Bruno D’Amore is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Theoretical Computer Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Bruno D’Amore has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 243 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Education, 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 9 papers in Theoretical Computer Science. Recurrent topics in Bruno D’Amore's work include Educational theories and practices (20 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (19 papers) and Educational and Social Studies (16 papers). Bruno D’Amore is often cited by papers focused on Educational theories and practices (20 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (19 papers) and Educational and Social Studies (16 papers). Bruno D’Amore collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Colombia and Spain. Bruno D’Amore's co-authors include Juan D. Godino, Vicenç Font, Vittorio Capecchi, Massimo Buscema, Pierluigi Contucci, Athanasios Gagatsis, Pedro Javier Rojas Garzón, Alberto Piatti and Guy Brousseau and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Leonardo and Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik.

In The Last Decade

Bruno D’Amore

61 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Bruno D’Amore Italy	8	171	48	48	28	25	86	243
Francisco Cordero Mexico	8	211 1.2×	65 1.4×	57 1.2×	29 1.0×	44 1.8×	47	270
Crisólogo Dolores Flores Mexico	8	300 1.8×	122 2.5×	37 0.8×	20 0.7×	71 2.8×	25	347
Nuria Climent Spain	8	375 2.2×	116 2.4×	82 1.7×	73 2.6×	24 1.0×	61	429
Berta Barquero Spain	9	173 1.0×	35 0.7×	38 0.8×	32 1.1×	29 1.2×	37	206
M. Cinta Muñoz-Catalán Spain	7	288 1.7×	93 1.9×	67 1.4×	58 2.1×	17 0.7×	23	323
Nielka Rojas Spain	5	223 1.3×	82 1.7×	59 1.2×	41 1.5×	15 0.6×	8	251
Belén Giacomone Spain	10	230 1.3×	117 2.4×	48 1.0×	114 4.1×	23 0.9×	32	318
María Magdalena Gea Spain	9	125 0.7×	180 3.8×	26 0.5×	40 1.4×	11 0.4×	71	283
Julia Valls González Spain	8	301 1.8×	102 2.1×	36 0.8×	60 2.1×	51 2.0×	33	345
Eric Flores-Medrano Mexico	7	258 1.5×	89 1.9×	66 1.4×	53 1.9×	20 0.8×	18	299

Countries citing papers authored by Bruno D’Amore

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bruno D’Amore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruno D’Amore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruno D’Amore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bruno D’Amore

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruno D’Amore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruno D’Amore. The network helps show where Bruno D’Amore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bruno D’Amore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bruno D’Amore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bruno D’Amore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bruno D’Amore. Bruno D’Amore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

D’Amore, Bruno, et al.. (2024). Consideraciones sobre la relación entre el Arte figurativo y la Matemática. PARADIGMA. e2024011–e2024011. 1 indexed citations

D’Amore, Bruno, et al.. (2015). Propuestas metodológicas que constituyeron ilusiones en el proceso de enseñanza de la matemática. Educación matemática. 27–43. 2 indexed citations

D’Amore, Bruno. (2011). Dante e la matematica. 1 indexed citations

Font, Vicenç, Juan D. Godino, & Bruno D’Amore. (2010). REPRESENTATIONS IN MATEMATICS EDUCATION: AN ONTO-SEMIOTIC APPROACH. HRB National Drugs Library (Health Research Board). 2(1). 58–86. 6 indexed citations

D’Amore, Bruno. (2008). Epistemology, Didactics of Mathematics, and Teaching Practices Epistemologia, Didática da Matemática e Práticas de Ensino. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations

D’Amore, Bruno & Juan D. Godino. (2007). El enfoque ontosemiótico como un desarrollo de la Teoría Antropológica en Didáctica de la Matemática. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17 indexed citations

D’Amore, Bruno. (2007). Epistemologia, Didática da Matemática e Práticas de Ensino. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 20(28). 179–205. 4 indexed citations

D’Amore, Bruno, Vicenç Font, & Juan D. Godino. (2007). La dimensión metadidáctica en los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje de la matemática. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 28(2). 49–77. 21 indexed citations

D’Amore, Bruno, et al.. (2007). Relaciones entre área y perímetro: convicciones de maestros y de estudiantes. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(1). 39–68. 4 indexed citations

10.

D’Amore, Bruno. (2006). Objetos, significados, representaciones semióticas y sentido. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 177–196. 9 indexed citations

11.

D’Amore, Bruno, et al.. (2006). Didáctica de la matemática. 10 indexed citations

12.

D’Amore, Bruno, et al.. (2005). Laboratorio di Matematica nella Scuola Primaria: attività per creare competenze. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna).

13.

D’Amore, Bruno, et al.. (2005). Didattica generale e didattica disciplinare. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 1 indexed citations

14.

D’Amore, Bruno. (2003). La complejidad de la educación y de la construcción del saber. Suma: Revista sobre Enseñanza y Aprendizaje de las Matemáticas. 23–30. 1 indexed citations

15.

D’Amore, Bruno, et al.. (2003). "Ejercicios anticipados" y "Zona de desarrollo próximo": comportamiento estratégico y lenguaje comunicativo en actividad de resolución de problemas. 357–378. 1 indexed citations

16.

D’Amore, Bruno. (2003). La Complexite de la Noetique en Mathematiques ou les Raisons de la Devolution Manquee.. for the learning of mathematics. 23(1). 47–51. 7 indexed citations

17.

D’Amore, Bruno, et al.. (2002). Producciones escritas de los estudiantes sobre argumentos de matemáticas (TEPs). 243–262. 3 indexed citations

18.

D’Amore, Bruno, et al.. (2000). Sobre la preparación teórica de los maestros de matemáticas. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 33–45. 2 indexed citations

19.

D’Amore, Bruno, et al.. (1999). Lo veo, pero no lo creo: Obstáculos epistemológicos y didácticos en el proceso de comprensión de un teorema de Georg Cantor que involucra al infinito actual. Educación matemática. 11(1). 5–24. 3 indexed citations

20.

D’Amore, Bruno. (1987). Motivazioni epistemologiche che stanno alla base delle scelte didattiche operate nelle attivita' educative in Italia, dalla scuola dell'inanzia al biennio superiore. RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya). 5(1). 323–324. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact