Bernhard Streicher

1.1k total citations
27 papers, 649 citations indexed

About

Bernhard Streicher is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Bernhard Streicher has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 649 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 9 papers in Applied Psychology and 8 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Bernhard Streicher's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers). Bernhard Streicher is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers). Bernhard Streicher collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Bernhard Streicher's co-authors include Dieter Frey, Eva Lermer, Claudia Peus, Jenny S. Wesche, Susanne Braun, Martina Raue, Rainer von Sachs, Eva Jonas, Günter W. Maier and Wolfgang Schobersberger and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Frontiers in Psychology and Risk Analysis.

In The Last Decade

Bernhard Streicher

24 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bernhard Streicher Germany 11 252 244 215 120 67 27 649
Cristiano L. Guarana United States 14 269 1.1× 154 0.6× 155 0.7× 70 0.6× 64 1.0× 26 629
Pedro I. Leiva Chile 11 345 1.4× 186 0.8× 217 1.0× 63 0.5× 70 1.0× 16 708
Héctor P. Madrid Chile 15 405 1.6× 172 0.7× 295 1.4× 66 0.6× 73 1.1× 27 750
Michael Schaerer Singapore 15 148 0.6× 337 1.4× 232 1.1× 51 0.4× 48 0.7× 29 640
Noah Eisenkraft United States 13 242 1.0× 318 1.3× 288 1.3× 57 0.5× 35 0.5× 29 705
Handan Kepir Sinangil United States 8 358 1.4× 139 0.6× 256 1.2× 71 0.6× 74 1.1× 17 725
Jordan H. Stein United States 9 296 1.2× 215 0.9× 195 0.9× 54 0.5× 49 0.7× 12 633
Kevin T. Mahoney United States 11 177 0.7× 153 0.6× 171 0.8× 37 0.3× 62 0.9× 16 496
Emily C. Bianchi United States 12 112 0.4× 256 1.0× 216 1.0× 31 0.3× 34 0.5× 20 549
Patrick E. Downes United States 9 305 1.2× 157 0.6× 206 1.0× 81 0.7× 55 0.8× 16 619

Countries citing papers authored by Bernhard Streicher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bernhard Streicher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernhard Streicher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernhard Streicher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bernhard Streicher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernhard Streicher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernhard Streicher. The network helps show where Bernhard Streicher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bernhard Streicher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bernhard Streicher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bernhard Streicher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bernhard Streicher. Bernhard Streicher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Streicher, Bernhard, et al.. (2023). The Risk Culture Framework: Introducing an Integrative Framework for Holistic Risk Analysis. SAGE Open. 13(3). 2 indexed citations
3.
Raue, Martina, Bernhard Streicher, & Eva Lermer. (2021). Perceived Safety : A Multidisciplinary Perspective. 7 indexed citations
4.
Streicher, Bernhard, Andrea Petróczi, Marie Overbye, et al.. (2021). The status quo before the International Standard for Education: Elite adolescent athletes’ perceptions of anti-doping education. Performance Enhancement & Health. 9(3-4). 100200–100200. 14 indexed citations
5.
Overbye, Marie, et al.. (2019). An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations. Journal of sport and health science. 9(3). 228–239. 45 indexed citations
6.
Raue, Martina, et al.. (2018). Risks Seem Low While Climbing High: Shift in Risk Perception and Error Rates in the Course of Indoor Climbing Activities. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 2383–2383. 5 indexed citations
7.
Lermer, Eva, Bernhard Streicher, Rainer von Sachs, Martina Raue, & Dieter Frey. (2015). Thinking Concretely Increases the Perceived Likelihood of Risks: The Effect of Construal Level on Risk Estimation. Risk Analysis. 36(3). 623–637. 43 indexed citations
8.
Raue, Martina, Bernhard Streicher, Eva Lermer, & Dieter Frey. (2015). Being active when judging risks: bodily states interfere with accurate risk analysis. Journal of Risk Research. 20(4). 445–462. 8 indexed citations
9.
Lermer, Eva, Bernhard Streicher, Rainer von Sachs, Martina Raue, & Dieter Frey. (2014). The effect of construal level on risk‐taking. European Journal of Social Psychology. 45(1). 99–109. 49 indexed citations
10.
Streicher, Bernhard, Verena Graupmann, & Silke Weisweiler. (2014). A spoonful of fairness: Training in fairness principles helps communicate bad news. International Journal of Training Research. 12(1). 71–82.
11.
Raue, Martina, Bernhard Streicher, Eva Lermer, & Dieter Frey. (2014). How far does it feel? Construal level and decisions under risk.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 4(3). 256–264. 41 indexed citations
12.
Streicher, Bernhard, et al.. (2013). Voice or Consistency? What You Perceive as Procedurally Fair Depends on Your Level of Power Distance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 45(2). 192–212. 10 indexed citations
13.
Streicher, Bernhard, Eva Jonas, Günter W. Maier, & Dieter Frey. (2012). Procedural Justice and Innovation: Does Procedural Justice Foster Innovative Behavior?. Psychology. 3(12). 1100–1103. 10 indexed citations
14.
Streicher, Bernhard, et al.. (2012). Procedural Fairness and Creativity: Does Voice Maintain People's Creative Vein Over Time?. Creativity Research Journal. 24(4). 358–363. 11 indexed citations
15.
Peus, Claudia, Jenny S. Wesche, Bernhard Streicher, Susanne Braun, & Dieter Frey. (2011). Authentic Leadership: An Empirical Test of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics. 107(3). 331–348. 257 indexed citations
16.
Streicher, Bernhard. (2010). Gerechtigkeit in Konfliktsituationen und in der Mediation. 13(4).
17.
Streicher, Bernhard, et al.. (2008). Test of the Construct and Criteria Validity of a German Measure of Organizational Justice. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 24(2). 131–139. 20 indexed citations
18.
Maier, Günter W., et al.. (2007). Gerechtigkeitseinschätzungen in Organisationen. Diagnostica. 53(2). 97–108. 40 indexed citations
19.
Maier, Günter W., Bernhard Streicher, Eva Jonas, & Dieter Frey. (2007). Bedürfnisse nach organisationaler Gerechtigkeit und Bereitschaft zu innovativen Handeln. 2007(2). 43–54. 1 indexed citations
20.
Frey, Dieter, Eva Traut‐Mattausch, Tobias Greitemeyer, & Bernhard Streicher. (2006). Psychologie der Innovationen in Organisationen. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026