Bas T. Hemker

17 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Bas T. Hemker
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Management Science and Operations Research 277
  • Statistics and Probability 134
  • Gender Studies 82
  • Computer Networks and Communications 178
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 74
Replace Daniel R. Eignor with:
Daniel R. Eignor United States
Mary Pommerich United States
Julio Olea Spain
Robert D. Ankenmann United States
Kuan‐Yu Jin Hong Kong
Michael G. Jodoin United States
G. Gage Kingsbury United States
Kentaro Yamamoto United States
Craig N. Mills United States
Alan D. Mead United States
Bas T. Hemker relative to Daniel R. Eignor United States Daniel R. Eignor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Daniel R. Eignor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bas T. Hemker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bas T. Hemker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bas T. Hemker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bas T. Hemker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bas T. Hemker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bas T. Hemker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bas T. Hemker. The network helps show where Bas T. Hemker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Bas T. Hemker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bas T. Hemker Line = papers co-authored together Bas T. Hemker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2005156
2 1995136
3 1997115
4 199656
5 199845
6 200136
7 200032
8 200423
9 200223
10
MSP: A program for Mokken Scale analysis for Polytomous Items: Version 3.0: User's manual
199419
11 202015
12
Over het gebruik van continue normering
20097
13 20215
14 20003
15 20073
16 20132
17 20241

About Bas T. Hemker

Bas T. Hemker is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Networks and Communications, Education, Sociology and Political Science and Statistics and Probability, having authored 17 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (11 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (8 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (4 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (1 paper), Technology and Data Analysis (1 paper) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (277 citations), Statistics and Probability (134 citations), Gender Studies (82 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (178 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (74 citations). Bas T. Hemker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Slovakia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Klaas Sijtsma, Ivo W. Molenaar, Hans Kuhlemeier, Brian W. Junker, L. Andries van der Ark, Jeroen K. Vermunt, Peter W. van Rijn, Theo J. H. M. Eggen, Ineke Molenaar and A. Susan M. Niessen. Their work appears in journals such as Psychometrika, Applied Psychological Measurement, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy and Computers & Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact