Michael G. Jodoin

14 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

Michael G. Jodoin
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Management Science and Operations Research 254
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 152
  • Gender Studies 133
  • Computer Networks and Communications 126
  • Education 109
Replace Carol M. Myford with:
Carol M. Myford United States
Russell W. Jones United States
Anne L. Harvey United States
Robert M. Pruzek United States
Michael L. Nering United States
Kimberly S. Maier United States
Ida Marais Australia
Daniel Jurich United States
Taehoon Kang South Korea
André F. De Champlain United States
Michael G. Jodoin relative to Carol M. Myford United States Carol M. Myford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Carol M. Myford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael G. Jodoin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael G. Jodoin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael G. Jodoin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael G. Jodoin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael G. Jodoin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael G. Jodoin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael G. Jodoin. The network helps show where Michael G. Jodoin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael G. Jodoin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael G. Jodoin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael G. Jodoin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael G. Jodoin. Michael G. Jodoin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 2
4 4
5 2
6 147
7 8
8 43
9 21
10 43
11
Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams
7
12 372
13 4
14
Running head: LOGISTIC REGRESSION FOR DIF DETECTION Evaluating Type I Error and Power Using an Effect Size Measure with the Logistic Regression Procedure for DIF Detection
1
15 2

About Michael G. Jodoin

Michael G. Jodoin is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, General Decision Sciences and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 15 papers that have together received 659 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (6 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (5 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (254 citations), Gender Studies (133 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (89 citations). Michael G. Jodoin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark J. Gierl, Jonathan D. Rubright, Michael Barone, April L. Zenisky, Ronald K. Hambleton, H. Swaminathan, Polina Harik, Don A. Klinger, David A. Johnson and Melissa J. Margolis. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Journal of Educational Measurement and The Journal of Experimental Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026