Countries citing papers authored by Mary Pommerich
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Pommerich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Pommerich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Pommerich more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Pommerich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Pommerich. The network helps show where Mary Pommerich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Pommerich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Pommerich.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Pommerich based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Pommerich. Mary Pommerich is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Baker, Harley, et al.. (2010). Development and Validation of the FYI - A Preliminary Report..1 indexed citations
Dorans, Neil J., Mary Pommerich, & Paul W. Holland. (2007). Linking and Aligning Scores and Scales. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).101 indexed citations
5.
Pommerich, Mary. (2007). The Effect of Using Item Parameters Calibrated from Paper Administrations in Computer Adaptive Test Administrations. Open Access Journals at BC (Boston College). 5(7).6 indexed citations
Pommerich, Mary & Daniel O. Segall. (2004). Calibrating CAT Pools and Online Pretest Items Using Marginal Maximum Likelihood Methods. 2003(1).5 indexed citations
Hanson, Bradley A., et al.. (2001). Suggestions for the Evaluation and Use of Concordance Results. ACT Research Report Series..3 indexed citations
12.
Pommerich, Mary, et al.. (2000). From Simulation to Application: Examinees React to Computerized Testing. 2000(1).14 indexed citations
13.
Pommerich, Mary, et al.. (1999). Issues in Creating and Reporting Concordance Results Based on Equipercentile Methods..3 indexed citations
14.
Pommerich, Mary, W. Alan Nicewander, & Bradley A. Hanson. (1999). Estimating Average Domain Scores. Journal of Educational Measurement. 36(3). 199–216.7 indexed citations
15.
Davey, Tim, Mary Pommerich, & Tony Thompson. (1999). Pretesting alongside an Operational CAT..2 indexed citations
16.
Noble, Julie, et al.. (1999). High School Academic and Noncognitive Variables Related to the ACT Scores of Racial/Ethnic and Gender Groups..2 indexed citations
17.
Dorans, Neil J., et al.. (1997). Concordance Between ACT Assessment and Recentered SAT I Sum Scores.. College and university. 73(2). 24–32.63 indexed citations
18.
Chen, Lee, Bradley A. Hanson, Michael J. Kolen, et al.. (1997). ACT's NAEP Redesign Project: Assessment Design Is the Key to Useful and Stable Assessment Results. Working Paper Series..1 indexed citations
19.
Pommerich, Mary. (1995). An Analytical Evaluation of Two Common-Odds Ratios as Population Indicators of DIF..6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.