Hans Kuhlemeier

554 total citations
15 papers, 408 citations indexed

About

Hans Kuhlemeier is a scholar working on Education, Language and Linguistics and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Hans Kuhlemeier has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 408 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Education, 5 papers in Language and Linguistics and 3 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Hans Kuhlemeier's work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (3 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers). Hans Kuhlemeier is often cited by papers focused on EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (3 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers). Hans Kuhlemeier collaborates with scholars based in Slovakia, Netherlands and Russia. Hans Kuhlemeier's co-authors include Huub van den Bergh, Bas T. Hemker and Gert Rijlaarsdam and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers & Education and Modern Language Journal.

In The Last Decade

Hans Kuhlemeier

13 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Hans Kuhlemeier
Hans Kuhlemeier
Citations per year, relative to Hans Kuhlemeier Hans Kuhlemeier (= 1×) peers Dzintra Iliško

Countries citing papers authored by Hans Kuhlemeier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Kuhlemeier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Kuhlemeier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Kuhlemeier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hans Kuhlemeier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Kuhlemeier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Kuhlemeier. The network helps show where Hans Kuhlemeier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans Kuhlemeier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans Kuhlemeier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans Kuhlemeier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hans Kuhlemeier. Hans Kuhlemeier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Kuhlemeier, Hans, et al.. (2017). De invloed van het LT-examenverslag op de scores. 18(4). 25–35. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kuhlemeier, Hans, et al.. (2014). Schrijfvaardigheid Nederlands vergeleken met de referentieniveaus: een verkenning. 15(2). 37–46. 3 indexed citations
3.
Kuhlemeier, Hans, Bas T. Hemker, & Huub van den Bergh. (2013). Impact of Verbal Scale Labels on the Elevation and Spread of Performance Ratings. Applied Measurement in Education. 26(1). 16–33. 2 indexed citations
4.
Kuhlemeier, Hans, et al.. (2005). Computergebruik thuis en internetvaardigheid in het voortgezet onderwijs. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 82(2). 115–136. 5 indexed citations
5.
Kuhlemeier, Hans & Bas T. Hemker. (2005). The impact of computer use at home on students’ Internet skills. Computers & Education. 49(2). 460–480. 156 indexed citations
6.
Kuhlemeier, Hans, Huub van den Bergh, & Gert Rijlaarsdam. (2002). The dimensionality of speaking and writing: A multilevel factor analysis of situational, task and school effects. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 72(4). 467–482. 8 indexed citations
7.
Kuhlemeier, Hans, et al.. (2001). Effect van toetsvorm en vraagtype op de moeilijkheid van de afsluitingstoetsen basisvorming: Een toepassing van multiniveau analyse met random kruisclassificatie. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 78(3). 197–211. 2 indexed citations
8.
Kuhlemeier, Hans & Huub van den Bergh. (2000). Departmental effectiveness in the third year of Dutch secondary education. Studies In Educational Evaluation. 26(4). 351–371. 5 indexed citations
9.
Kuhlemeier, Hans, et al.. (1999). Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior in Dutch Secondary Education. The Journal of Environmental Education. 30(2). 4–14. 180 indexed citations
10.
Kuhlemeier, Hans & Huub van den Bergh. (1998). Relationships between Language Skills and Task Effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 86(2). 443–463. 6 indexed citations
11.
Kuhlemeier, Hans & Huub van den Bergh. (1997). Effects of writing instruction and assessment on functional composition performance. Assessing Writing. 4(2). 203–223. 5 indexed citations
12.
Kuhlemeier, Hans, et al.. (1996). Attitudes and Achievements in the First Year of German Language Instruction in Dutch Secondary Education. Modern Language Journal. 80(4). 494–508. 27 indexed citations
13.
Kuhlemeier, Hans, et al.. (1996). Attitudes and Achievements in the First Year of German Language Instruction in Dutch Secondary Education. Modern Language Journal. 80(4). 494–494. 4 indexed citations
14.
Kuhlemeier, Hans, et al.. (1996). Comparison of two german language courses in dutch secondary education. Studies In Educational Evaluation. 22(2). 181–205. 3 indexed citations
15.
Bergh, Huub van den, et al.. (1993). Tijdsbesteding van docenten in het voortgezet onderwijs op verschillende manieren gemeten: een validatiestudie. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 18(5). 306–316. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026