Arlene Archer

904 citations
50 papers · 455 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Arlene Archer

46 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Arlene Archer
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Literature and Literary Theory 208
  • Library and Information Sciences 20
  • Language and Linguistics 93
  • Speech and Hearing 48
  • Education 192
Replace Christine H. Leland with:
Christine H. Leland United States
Stuart Greene United States
Art Young United States
Barbara Moss United States
Margaret Mackey Canada
Neal Lerner United States
Kathleen A. Hinchman United States
Nancie Atwell
Martin Coles United Kingdom
Elena Forzani United States
Arlene Archer relative to Christine H. Leland United States Christine H. Leland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Christine H. Leland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Arlene Archer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arlene Archer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arlene Archer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arlene Archer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arlene Archer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arlene Archer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arlene Archer. The network helps show where Arlene Archer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Arlene Archer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Arlene Archer Line = papers co-authored together Arlene Archer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Challenges and Potentials for Writing Centres in South African Tertiary Institutions.
201071
2 200463
3 200650
4 201030
5 201718
6 200816
7 201112
8 200812
9 197011
10 201111
11 20119
12 19709
13 20219
14 20069
15 20169
16 20178
17 20147
18 20147
19
A Project-Based Approach to Numeracy Practices at University Focusing on HIV/AIDS.
20026
20 20226

About Arlene Archer

Arlene Archer is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Education, Speech and Hearing and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (26 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (23 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (20 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (11 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (7 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (3 papers) and Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (208 citations), Library and Information Sciences (20 citations), Language and Linguistics (93 citations), Speech and Hearing (48 citations) and Education (192 citations). Arlene Archer has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Marion Walton, Denise Newfield, Moragh Paxton, Rachel Weiss and Daniela Gachago. Their work appears in journals such as Visual Communication, Social Semiotics, English in Education, Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies and English Academy Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact