Nancie Atwell
- Education top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Thomas NewkirkCharles R. Cooper
- Topics
- Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers)Literacy, Media, and Education (5 papers)Writing and Handwriting Education (4 papers)
- Journals
- Learning Research and PracticeHeinemann eBooksLanguage Arts
In The Last Decade
Nancie Atwell
19 papers receiving 437 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Education 634
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 364
- Literature and Literary Theory 305
- Language and Linguistics 144
- Sociology and Political Science 89
Countries citing papers authored by Nancie Atwell
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancie Atwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancie Atwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancie Atwell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancie Atwell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancie Atwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancie Atwell. The network helps show where Nancie Atwell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancie Atwell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancie Atwell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancie Atwell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancie Atwell. Nancie Atwell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | In the middle : a lifetime of learning about writing, reading, and adolescents | 22 |
| 3 | The Pleasure Principle. | 1 |
| 4 | The Reading Zone: How to Help Kids Become Skilled, Passionate, Habitual, Critical Readers | 49 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | In the Middle: New Understandings about Writing, Reading, and Learning. Second Edition. | 3 |
| 7 | In the Middle: New Understandings About Writing, Reading, and Learning | 255 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | Joe's Top Nine. | 0 |
| 10 | The politics of process | 2 |
| 11 | Seeking Diversity: Language Arts with Adolescents | 56 |
| 12 | Side by Side: Essays on Teaching to Learn | 21 |
| 13 | Understanding Writing: Ways of Observing, Learning, and Teaching. K-8. Second Edition. | 3 |
| 14 | Understanding Writing: Ways of Observing, Learning, and Teaching | 18 |
| 15 | Nancie Atwell on How We Learned to Write. | 3 |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Nancie Atwell
Nancie Atwell is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Education, having authored 25 papers that have together received 877 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (5 papers) and Writing and Handwriting Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (364 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (305 citations) and Education (634 citations). Frequent co-authors include Thomas Newkirk and Charles R. Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Learning Research and Practice, Heinemann eBooks and Language Arts.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.