English Academy Review

402 papers and 841 indexed citations i.

About

The 402 papers published in English Academy Review in the last decades have received a total of 841 indexed citations. Papers published in English Academy Review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (181 papers), Sociology and Political Science (140 papers) and Anthropology (49 papers) specifically the topics of South African History and Culture (82 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (78 papers) and African history and culture studies (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in English Academy Review are Njabulo S. Ndebele, Carolyn McKinney, Michael Chapman, Shane Graham, Sabelo J. Ndlovu‐Gatsheni, John Higgins, Michaël Green, Antjie Krog, Jessica Murray and Randolph Quirk.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in English Academy Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in English Academy Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in English Academy Review.

Countries where authors publish in English Academy Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in English Academy Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in English Academy Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites English Academy Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025