Kai Epstude

3.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
50 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Kai Epstude is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kai Epstude has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Social Psychology, 21 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 21 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kai Epstude's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (20 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (12 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (11 papers). Kai Epstude is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (20 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (12 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (11 papers). Kai Epstude collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Kai Epstude's co-authors include Neal J. Roese, Thomas Mussweiler, Susanne Scheibe, Linda Steg, Ayça Berfu Ünal, Sabine Otten, Jens Förster, Rachel Smallman, Mike Morrison and Florian Fessel and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Kai Epstude

48 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 2021 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kai Epstude Netherlands 21 822 699 674 632 437 50 2.3k
Loran F. Nordgren United States 26 778 0.9× 831 1.2× 886 1.3× 604 1.0× 526 1.2× 43 3.0k
Karen Gasper United States 18 904 1.1× 475 0.7× 794 1.2× 777 1.2× 504 1.2× 39 2.2k
Abigail A. Scholer United States 25 724 0.9× 651 0.9× 374 0.6× 497 0.8× 974 2.2× 73 2.1k
Jane L. Risen United States 19 1.1k 1.4× 675 1.0× 820 1.2× 347 0.5× 279 0.6× 41 2.3k
Yoav Bar‐Anan Israel 22 1.0k 1.3× 1.3k 1.9× 607 0.9× 425 0.7× 595 1.4× 56 2.6k
Hal E. Hershfield United States 25 916 1.1× 548 0.8× 385 0.6× 757 1.2× 661 1.5× 62 2.6k
Keith D. Markman United States 24 664 0.8× 732 1.0× 562 0.8× 587 0.9× 722 1.7× 45 2.5k
Annette Y. Lee-Chai United States 7 989 1.2× 1.1k 1.6× 521 0.8× 365 0.6× 590 1.4× 11 2.1k
Emily Balcetis United States 20 679 0.8× 641 0.9× 766 1.1× 404 0.6× 352 0.8× 65 1.8k
Steven J. Stroessner United States 21 1.3k 1.6× 1.2k 1.8× 498 0.7× 472 0.7× 456 1.0× 40 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Kai Epstude

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kai Epstude's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kai Epstude with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kai Epstude more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kai Epstude

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kai Epstude. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kai Epstude. The network helps show where Kai Epstude may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kai Epstude

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kai Epstude. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kai Epstude based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kai Epstude. Kai Epstude is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Epstude, Kai, et al.. (2025). Multiple goal salience and emotion regulation in negative-feedback situations: A latent profile analysis. Personality and Individual Differences. 239. 113113–113113.
2.
Fennis, Bob M., et al.. (2024). Source credibility effects in misinformation research: A review and primer. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 2(1). e443610–e443610. 2 indexed citations
3.
Epstude, Kai, et al.. (2024). Whether and how to regulate: Emotion regulation in negative-feedback situations.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 153(5). 1281–1308. 3 indexed citations
4.
Kreienkamp, Jannis, et al.. (2023). The Migration Experience: A Conceptual Framework and Systematic Scoping Review of Psychological Acculturation. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 28(1). 81–116. 9 indexed citations
5.
6.
Kreienkamp, Jannis, Maximilian Agostini, Laura F. Bringmann, Peter de Jonge, & Kai Epstude. (2023). Need Fulfillment During Intergroup Contact: Three Experience Sampling Studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 51(6). 1047–1077. 3 indexed citations
7.
Epstude, Kai, Daniel A. Effron, & Neal J. Roese. (2022). Polarized imagination: partisanship influences the direction and consequences of counterfactual thinking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 377(1866). 20210342–20210342. 3 indexed citations
8.
Winter, Kevin & Kai Epstude. (2022). Motivational consequences of counterfactual mindsets: Does counterfactual structure influence the use of conservative or risky tactics?. Motivation and Emotion. 47(1). 100–114. 5 indexed citations
9.
Scheibe, Susanne, et al.. (2020). When Ignoring Negative Feedback Is Functional: Presenting a Model of Motivated Feedback Disengagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 30(1). 3–10. 24 indexed citations
11.
Kutlaca, Maja, Martijn van Zomeren, & Kai Epstude. (2020). Friends or foes? How activists and non-activists perceive and evaluate each other. PLoS ONE. 15(4). e0230918–e0230918. 19 indexed citations
12.
Eisma, Maarten C., et al.. (2020). Upward and Downward Counterfactual Thought After Loss: A Multiwave Controlled Longitudinal Study. Behavior Therapy. 52(3). 577–593. 19 indexed citations
13.
Ünal, Ayça Berfu, et al.. (2012). Blocking-out auditory distracters while driving: A cognitive strategy to reduce task-demands on the road. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 50. 934–942. 21 indexed citations
14.
Corcoran, Katja, et al.. (2011). Fast similarities: Efficiency advantages of similarity-focused comparisons.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 37(5). 1280–1286. 14 indexed citations
15.
Epstude, Kai & Neal J. Roese. (2011). When Goal Pursuit Fails. Social Psychology. 42(1). 19–27. 61 indexed citations
16.
Mussweiler, Thomas & Kai Epstude. (2009). Relatively fast! Efficiency advantages of comparative thinking.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 138(1). 1–21. 82 indexed citations
17.
Fessel, Florian, Kai Epstude, & Neal J. Roese. (2009). Hindsight bias redefined: It’s about time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 110(1). 56–64. 20 indexed citations
18.
Förster, Jens, et al.. (2009). Why Love Has Wings and Sex Has Not: How Reminders of Love and Sex Influence Creative and Analytic Thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 35(11). 1479–1491. 53 indexed citations
19.
Keil, Andreas, Thomas Mussweiler, & Kai Epstude. (2006). Alpha-band activity reflects reduction of mental effort in a comparison task: A source space analysis. Brain Research. 1121(1). 117–127. 41 indexed citations
20.
Mussweiler, Thomas, et al.. (2004). The Ups and Downs of Social Comparison: Mechanisms of Assimilation and Contrast.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 87(6). 832–844. 266 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026