Annick Weil‐Barais

402 total citations
41 papers, 216 citations indexed

About

Annick Weil‐Barais is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Annick Weil‐Barais has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 216 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Education, 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 12 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Annick Weil‐Barais's work include Education, sociology, and vocational training (11 papers), French Language Learning Methods (8 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (8 papers). Annick Weil‐Barais is often cited by papers focused on Education, sociology, and vocational training (11 papers), French Language Learning Methods (8 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (8 papers). Annick Weil‐Barais collaborates with scholars based in France, French Polynesia and Brazil. Annick Weil‐Barais's co-authors include Marie‐Geneviève Séré, Martine Méheut, Maria Luisa Schubauer-Leoni, Roger Lécuyer, Nilza Costa, François‐Xavier Bernard, J. Bernardino Lopes, Jacques Mathieu and Isabelle Vinatier and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Science Education and International Journal of Science Education.

In The Last Decade

Annick Weil‐Barais

34 papers receiving 183 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annick Weil‐Barais France 9 153 91 48 27 25 41 216
Molly E. Romano United States 8 248 1.6× 61 0.7× 31 0.6× 24 0.9× 9 0.4× 12 293
Larry R. Johannessen United States 10 232 1.5× 76 0.8× 26 0.5× 29 1.1× 15 0.6× 39 318
Alain Baudrit France 9 150 1.0× 95 1.0× 44 0.9× 60 2.2× 12 0.5× 40 252
Karen Worth United States 6 225 1.5× 116 1.3× 24 0.5× 21 0.8× 15 0.6× 11 275
Margaret Rintamaa United States 8 191 1.2× 140 1.5× 19 0.4× 29 1.1× 19 0.8× 16 270
Andrew Gilbert United States 9 218 1.4× 77 0.8× 19 0.4× 30 1.1× 25 1.0× 22 275
Perc Marland Australia 10 195 1.3× 64 0.7× 27 0.6× 36 1.3× 11 0.4× 15 256
Götz Krummheuer Germany 9 266 1.7× 113 1.2× 12 0.3× 54 2.0× 18 0.7× 23 319
Brian Edmiston United States 10 158 1.0× 27 0.3× 21 0.4× 52 1.9× 10 0.4× 24 255
Ángela K. Salmon United States 9 168 1.1× 66 0.7× 19 0.4× 27 1.0× 12 0.5× 19 220

Countries citing papers authored by Annick Weil‐Barais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annick Weil‐Barais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annick Weil‐Barais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annick Weil‐Barais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annick Weil‐Barais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annick Weil‐Barais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annick Weil‐Barais. The network helps show where Annick Weil‐Barais may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annick Weil‐Barais

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annick Weil‐Barais. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annick Weil‐Barais based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annick Weil‐Barais. Annick Weil‐Barais is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Weil‐Barais, Annick & Isabelle Vinatier. (2022). Présentation du dossier « Hommage à Gérard Vergnaud : conceptualisation dans l’action ». Bulletin de psychologie. Numéro 578(4). 271–272.
2.
Weil‐Barais, Annick, et al.. (2015). Cognitive determinants of early letter knowledge. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. 23(1). 86–98. 6 indexed citations
3.
Weil‐Barais, Annick, et al.. (2013). Parenting Education: Which Intervention Model to Use?. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 106. 2008–2021. 7 indexed citations
4.
Weil‐Barais, Annick, et al.. (2010). La compréhension des expressions idiomatiques à l'école maternelle. Bulletin de psychologie. Numéro 510(6). 469–480. 3 indexed citations
5.
Weil‐Barais, Annick, et al.. (2009). Initiation scientifique et développement intellectuel de l’enfant à l’âge pré-scolaire. Les dossiers des sciences de l éducation. 21(1). 101–113. 1 indexed citations
6.
Weil‐Barais, Annick, et al.. (2007). La compréhension des expressions idiomatiques à 5 ans : une étude exploratoire. Enfance. Vol. 59(4). 339–355. 6 indexed citations
7.
Weil‐Barais, Annick, et al.. (2005). Évaluation cognitive d'un logiciel de modélisation auprès d'élèves de collège / A Cognitive Analysis of Simulation Software Used by 13-15 Year Old Pupils. DSpace (Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique). 27(1). 133–149. 7 indexed citations
8.
Weil‐Barais, Annick, et al.. (2003). Elaboration de connaissances relatives à un dispositif technique dans un contexte d’interaction parent-enfant. Bulletin de psychologie. 56(466). 509–519. 1 indexed citations
9.
Weil‐Barais, Annick, et al.. (2003). Interactions maître-élèves en cours d’activités scientifiques à l’école maternelle : approche comparative. Bulletin de psychologie. 56(466). 493–508. 9 indexed citations
10.
Weil‐Barais, Annick. (2001). Los constructivimos y la didactica de las ciencias. 197–207. 2 indexed citations
11.
Weil‐Barais, Annick. (2001). L’échec scolaire : de l’invention à la prévention. Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche). 126(1). 199–211.
12.
Lopes, J. Bernardino, et al.. (1999). Évaluation de la maîtrise des concepts de la mécanique chez des étudiants et des professeurs / Evaluation of students'and teachers' mastery of mechanics concepts. DSpace (Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique). 14(1). 11–38. 2 indexed citations
13.
Weil‐Barais, Annick, et al.. (1990). 12 - Acquisition de connaissances scientifiques et développement. Cairn.info. 247–260. 1 indexed citations
14.
Weil‐Barais, Annick, et al.. (1988). Gestion d'activités de modélisation en classe. Aster. 7(1). 121–141. 3 indexed citations
15.
Séré, Marie‐Geneviève & Annick Weil‐Barais. (1988). Nouvelle approche de la conservation des grandeurs physiques. Etude transversale de la conservation de la quantité de gaz auprès d'élèves de 11 à 15 ans. Enfance. 41(1). 21–37. 1 indexed citations
16.
Weil‐Barais, Annick, et al.. (1986). Evolution of expectations of constancy of quantity of air by 10–11 years old students. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2 indexed citations
17.
Lécuyer, Roger, et al.. (1985). Enquête nationale sur les étudiants en psychologie. Bulletin de psychologie. 39(373). 7–88. 3 indexed citations
18.
Mathieu, Jacques, et al.. (1985). Raisonnement analogique et résolution de problèmes. L’Année psychologique. 85(1). 49–72. 3 indexed citations
19.
Weil‐Barais, Annick. (1984). L'étude des connaissances des élèves comme préalable à l'action didactique. Bulletin de psychologie. 38(368). 157–160. 3 indexed citations
20.
Weil‐Barais, Annick. (1972). Etude comparative de matériels didactiques. Analyse de leur efficacité en fonction du niveau initial de l'étudiant. Bulletin de psychologie. 25(297). 473–481. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026