Anna Pompei

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Anna Pompei is a scholar working on Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Pompei has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Food Science, 8 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 6 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Anna Pompei's work include Probiotics and Fermented Foods (9 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (6 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (4 papers). Anna Pompei is often cited by papers focused on Probiotics and Fermented Foods (9 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (6 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (4 papers). Anna Pompei collaborates with scholars based in Italy and Austria. Anna Pompei's co-authors include Alberto Amaretti, Maddalena Rossi, Diego Matteuzzi, Simona Zanoni, Stefano Raimondi, Lisa Cordisco, Mattia Di Nunzio, Alessandra Bordoni, Claudio Corradini and B. Riccò and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Journal of Nutrition and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

In The Last Decade

Anna Pompei

17 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

Antioxidant properties of potentially probiotic bacteria:... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Pompei Italy 16 853 764 706 191 175 17 1.7k
Paola Carnevali Italy 18 863 1.0× 670 0.9× 399 0.6× 159 0.8× 128 0.7× 29 1.5k
Guicheng Huo China 24 1.1k 1.3× 662 0.9× 331 0.5× 250 1.3× 161 0.9× 56 1.6k
M. Carmen Martínez‐Cuesta Spain 25 1.1k 1.2× 1.1k 1.4× 662 0.9× 242 1.3× 111 0.6× 62 2.0k
Yanling Hao China 26 1.2k 1.4× 1.0k 1.4× 417 0.6× 117 0.6× 241 1.4× 112 2.0k
Simona Zanoni Italy 10 584 0.7× 474 0.6× 611 0.9× 136 0.7× 138 0.8× 10 1.1k
Bryan W. Wolf United States 19 435 0.5× 485 0.6× 1.1k 1.6× 280 1.5× 245 1.4× 29 1.8k
Dustin Heeney United States 11 1.0k 1.2× 961 1.3× 471 0.7× 245 1.3× 166 0.9× 18 1.8k
Maurice Ndagijimana Italy 28 1.1k 1.2× 1.0k 1.3× 416 0.6× 230 1.2× 159 0.9× 44 2.4k
Margriet H. C. Schoterman Netherlands 20 819 1.0× 497 0.7× 882 1.2× 326 1.7× 361 2.1× 27 1.7k
Kátia Sivieri Brazil 29 1.1k 1.3× 1.1k 1.4× 780 1.1× 444 2.3× 188 1.1× 88 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Pompei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Pompei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Pompei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Pompei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Pompei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Pompei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Pompei. The network helps show where Anna Pompei may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Pompei

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Pompei. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Pompei based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Pompei. Anna Pompei is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Grossi, Marco, et al.. (2013). A Portable Sensor With Disposable Electrodes for Water Bacterial Quality Assessment. IEEE Sensors Journal. 13(5). 1775–1782. 40 indexed citations
2.
Biagi, G., Irene Cipollini, Alessio Bonaldo, et al.. (2012). Effect of feeding a selected combination of galacto-oligosaccharides and a strain of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum on the intestinal microbiota of cats. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 74(1). 90–95. 20 indexed citations
3.
Amaretti, Alberto, Mattia Di Nunzio, Anna Pompei, et al.. (2012). Antioxidant properties of potentially probiotic bacteria: in vitro and in vivo activities. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 97(2). 809–817. 407 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Girotti, Stefano, et al.. (2011). Bioremediation of hydrocarbons contaminated waters and soils: monitoring by luminescent bacteria test. International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry. 91(9). 900–909. 4 indexed citations
5.
Grossi, Marco, M. Lanzoni, Anna Pompei, et al.. (2010). An embedded portable biosensor system for bacterial concentration detection. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 26(3). 983–990. 34 indexed citations
6.
Grossi, Marco, et al.. (2009). Total Bacterial Count in Soft-Frozen Dairy Products by Impedance Biosensor System. IEEE Sensors Journal. 9(10). 1270–1276. 28 indexed citations
7.
Pompei, Anna, Lisa Cordisco, Stefano Raimondi, et al.. (2008). In vitro comparison of the prebiotic effects of two inulin-type fructans. Anaerobe. 14(5). 280–286. 106 indexed citations
8.
Grossi, Marco, M. Lanzoni, Anna Pompei, et al.. (2008). Detection of microbial concentration in ice-cream using the impedance technique. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 23(11). 1616–1623. 35 indexed citations
9.
Zanoni, Simona, Anna Pompei, Lisa Cordisco, et al.. (2008). Growth kinetics on oligo- and polysaccharides and promising features of three antioxidative potential probiotic strains. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 105(5). 1266–1276. 38 indexed citations
10.
Pompei, Anna, Lisa Cordisco, Alberto Amaretti, et al.. (2007). Administration of Folate-Producing Bifidobacteria Enhances Folate Status in Wistar Rats ,. Journal of Nutrition. 137(12). 2742–2746. 87 indexed citations
11.
Musenga, Alessandro, Roberto Mandrioli, P. Bonifazi, et al.. (2007). Sensitive and selective determination of glutathione in probiotic bacteria by capillary electrophoresis–laser induced fluorescence. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 387(3). 917–924. 45 indexed citations
12.
Biagi, G., Irene Cipollini, Anna Pompei, G. Zaghini, & Diego Matteuzzi. (2007). Effect of a Lactobacillus animalis strain on composition and metabolism of the intestinal microflora in adult dogs. Veterinary Microbiology. 124(1-2). 160–165. 68 indexed citations
13.
Amaretti, Alberto, et al.. (2006). Fermentative production of superoxide dismutase with Kluyveromyces marxianus. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology. 34(1). 27–34. 27 indexed citations
14.
Pompei, Anna, Lisa Cordisco, Alberto Amaretti, et al.. (2006). Folate Production by Bifidobacteria as a Potential Probiotic Property. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 73(1). 179–185. 258 indexed citations
15.
Amaretti, Alberto, Elena Tamburini, Tatiana Bernardi, et al.. (2006). Substrate preference of Bifidobacterium adolescentis MB 239: compared growth on single and mixed carbohydrates. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 73(3). 654–662. 55 indexed citations
16.
Massimo, C. Di, et al.. (2006). Impairment of plasma nitric oxide availability in senescent healthy individuals: apparent involvement of extracellular superoxide dismutase activity.. PubMed. 35(1-2). 231–7. 16 indexed citations
17.
Rossi, Maddalena, Claudio Corradini, Alberto Amaretti, et al.. (2005). Fermentation of Fructooligosaccharides and Inulin by Bifidobacteria: a Comparative Study of Pure and Fecal Cultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 71(10). 6150–6158. 421 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026