Anders Weinstein

937 total citations
9 papers, 489 citations indexed

About

Anders Weinstein is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, Anders Weinstein has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 489 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 3 papers in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in Anders Weinstein's work include Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (6 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers). Anders Weinstein is often cited by papers focused on Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (6 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers). Anders Weinstein collaborates with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Anders Weinstein's co-authors include Kurt VanLehn, Kay G. Schulze, Robert Shelby, M. C. Wintersgill, Collin Lynch, Joel A. Shapiro, D.J. Treacy, Michael Ringenberg, Pamela Jordan and Antônio C. Roque and has published in prestigious journals such as Behavioral Neuroscience, Natural Language Engineering and International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

In The Last Decade

Anders Weinstein

9 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anders Weinstein United States	6	385	252	198	82	44	9	489
Kay G. Schulze United States	8	401 1.0×	261 1.0×	227 1.1×	88 1.1×	41 0.9×	17	543
James R. Segedy United States	8	188 0.5×	257 1.0×	188 0.9×	96 1.2×	38 0.9×	17	381
Angela Z. Wagner United States	9	381 1.0×	304 1.2×	335 1.7×	84 1.0×	63 1.4×	14	554
Sujith M. Gowda United States	12	461 1.2×	244 1.0×	488 2.5×	104 1.3×	74 1.7×	18	678
Jonathan Sewall United States	8	303 0.8×	221 0.9×	194 1.0×	50 0.6×	42 1.0×	17	402
Benedict du Boulay United Kingdom	11	155 0.4×	197 0.8×	201 1.0×	83 1.0×	27 0.6×	50	422
Sergio Gutiérrez-Santos United Kingdom	11	148 0.4×	181 0.7×	197 1.0×	104 1.3×	18 0.4×	28	339
David Arnau Spain	11	154 0.4×	95 0.4×	103 0.5×	88 1.1×	42 1.0×	33	314
Ramkumar Rajendran India	9	102 0.3×	113 0.4×	127 0.6×	48 0.6×	32 0.7×	31	268
Hogyeong Jeong United States	6	164 0.4×	164 0.7×	133 0.7×	59 0.7×	17 0.4×	12	275

Countries citing papers authored by Anders Weinstein

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anders Weinstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anders Weinstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anders Weinstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anders Weinstein

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anders Weinstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anders Weinstein. The network helps show where Anders Weinstein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anders Weinstein

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anders Weinstein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anders Weinstein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anders Weinstein. Anders Weinstein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Mostow, Jack, et al.. (2016). Developing, evaluating, and refining an automatic generator of diagnostic multiple choice cloze questions to assess children's comprehension while reading. Natural Language Engineering. 23(2). 245–294. 13 indexed citations

2.

Samson, Rachel D., et al.. (2015). Age differences in strategy selection and risk preference during risk-based decision making.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 129(2). 138–148. 5 indexed citations

3.

Sitaram, Sunayana, et al.. (2011). What visual feedback should a reading tutor give children on their oral reading prosody?. 153–156. 2 indexed citations

4.

Koedinger, Kenneth R., et al.. (2007). Exploring Alternative Methods for Error Attribution in Learning Curves Analysis in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. 246–253. 6 indexed citations

5.

VanLehn, Kurt, Collin Lynch, Kay G. Schulze, et al.. (2005). The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 15(3). 147–204. 1 indexed citations

6.

VanLehn, Kurt, Collin Lynch, Kay G. Schulze, et al.. (2005). The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned. 15(3). 147–204. 326 indexed citations

7.

VanLehn, Kurt, Collin Lynch, Kay G. Schulze, et al.. (2005). The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Five Years of Evaluations. 678–685. 65 indexed citations

8.

Jordan, Pamela, Michael Ringenberg, Antônio C. Roque, et al.. (2002). Interactive Conceptual Tutoring in Atlas-Andes. 62 indexed citations

9.

Shelby, Robert, et al.. (2001). An assessment of the Andes tutor. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact