D.J. Treacy

23 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers

D.J. Treacy
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Computer Science Applications 174
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 207
  • Pharmaceutical Science 71
  • Ceramics and Composites 57
  • Artificial Intelligence 307
Replace Boyd L. Earl with:
Boyd L. Earl United States
R. D. Knight United States
Daniel F. Styer United States
Maria Bondani Italy
Paul van Kampen Ireland
Martin Schäfer Germany
David E. Pritchard United States
J.H. Reeves United States
Wen-Ping Chen Taiwan
C. Cari Indonesia
D.J. Treacy relative to Boyd L. Earl United States Boyd L. Earl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.8×
Boyd L. Earl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D.J. Treacy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.J. Treacy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.J. Treacy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.J. Treacy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.J. Treacy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.J. Treacy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.J. Treacy. The network helps show where D.J. Treacy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D.J. Treacy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D.J. Treacy Line = papers co-authored together D.J. Treacy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201693
2 20051
3 2005326
4 200015
5 20007
6 20003
7 19996
8 19975
9 19924
10 199115
11 198411
12 198328
13 198311
14 198110
15 198038
16 197920
17 19779
18 19777
19 197516
20 19723

About D.J. Treacy

D.J. Treacy is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Radiation, Ceramics and Composites, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 23 papers that have together received 727 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase-change materials and chalcogenides (6 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (5 papers), Crystal Structures and Properties (3 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (3 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (3 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (3 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (174 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (207 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (71 citations), Ceramics and Composites (57 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (307 citations). D.J. Treacy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Collin Lynch, Kay G. Schulze, Kurt VanLehn, Anders Weinstein, M. C. Wintersgill, Robert Shelby, Joel A. Shapiro, P. C. Taylor, U. Strom and Xavier Pépin. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Solid State Communications and International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026