Replace Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics with:
Transactions of the Association for Computational LinguisticsUnited States
Connection ScienceChina
Cognitive Systems ResearchUnited States
Semantic WebGermany
Literary and Linguistic ComputingUnited Kingdom
Minds and MachinesUnited States
Program electronic library and information systemsUnited Kingdom
The Knowledge Engineering ReviewUnited Kingdom
Information RetrievalUnited States
IEEE Transactions on Learning TechnologiesUnited States
Transactions of the Association for Computational LinguisticsUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Natural Language Engineering
Natural Language Engineering · 1×
×1.624.6kAI
×1.13.1kIS
×5.46.7kCVPR
×1.21.5kMB
×0.6498LL
Citations per year, relative to Natural Language Engineering
Natural Language Engineering · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Natural Language Engineering
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Natural Language Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Natural Language Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Language Engineering more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Natural Language Engineering
This network shows the impact of papers published in Natural Language Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Natural Language Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.