Amy E. Barth

2.6k citations
48 papers · 1.9k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Amy E. Barth

46 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Amy E. Barth
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.2k
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 81
  • Clinical Psychology 169
  • Statistics and Probability 20
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 32
Replace Deborah L. Speece with:
Deborah L. Speece United States
Carolyn A. Denton United States
Valentina Tobia Italy
Stephanie L. Haft United States
Nancy Mather United States
Kelly B. Cartwright United States
Shelley I. Gray United States
Susan E. Stothard United Kingdom
Marja‐Leena Laakso Finland
Nancy K. Scammacca United States
Amy E. Barth relative to Deborah L. Speece United States Deborah L. Speece's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.0×
Deborah L. Speece · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Barth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Barth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Barth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Barth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Barth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Barth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Barth. The network helps show where Amy E. Barth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy E. Barth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy E. Barth Line = papers co-authored together Amy E. Barth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010160
2 2012107
3 2011103
4 201195
5 201188
6 200184
7 200979
8 200878
9 201477
10 201175
11 200972
12 201370
13 201569
14 200865
15 201058
16 200850
17 201450
18 201144
19 201041
20 200838

About Amy E. Barth

Amy E. Barth is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (38 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.2k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (81 citations), Clinical Psychology (169 citations), Statistics and Probability (20 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (32 citations). Amy E. Barth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jack McKay Fletcher, Sharon R. Vaughn, David J. Francis, Carolyn A. Denton, Paul T. Cirino, Karla K. Stuebing, Jade Wexler, Melissa A. Romain, Tammy D. Tolar and Jeanne Wanzek. Their work appears in journals such as Learning and Individual Differences, Reading and Writing, Scientific Studies of Reading, School Psychology Review and Journal of Educational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact