Amanda Peel
- Education top 5%
- Computer Science Applications top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Patricia FriedrichsenTroy D. SadlerLaura ZangoriAndrew T. KinslowChampa Sengupta‐GopalanMark SegerEnrico PontelliEric Hayes
- Topics
- Teaching and Learning Programming (14 papers)Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (10 papers)Science Education and Pedagogy (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelBrazil
In The Last Decade
Amanda Peel
22 papers receiving 420 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Education 187
- Computer Science Applications 186
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 159
- Molecular Biology 79
- Plant Science 54
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Peel
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Peel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Peel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Peel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Peel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Peel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Peel. The network helps show where Amanda Peel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Peel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Peel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Peel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Peel. Amanda Peel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | Workshops and Co-design Can Help Teachers Integrate Computational Thinking into Their K-12 STEM Classes | 4 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | Seeds of (r)Evolution: Constructionism Co-Design with High School Science Teachers | 1 |
| 10 | 54 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 96 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Amanda Peel
Amanda Peel is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Media Technology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (14 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (10 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (186 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (159 citations) and Education (187 citations). Amanda Peel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Friedrichsen, Troy D. Sadler, Laura Zangori, Andrew T. Kinslow, Champa Sengupta‐Gopalan, Mark Seger, Enrico Pontelli, Eric Hayes, Uri Wilensky and Michael Horn. Their work appears in journals such as Planta, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and International Journal of Science Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.