Harvard Educational Review

1.5k papers and 88.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Harvard Educational Review in the last decades have received a total of 88.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Harvard Educational Review usually cover Education (803 papers), Sociology and Political Science (457 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (124 papers) specifically the topics of Critical Race Theory in Education (169 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (166 papers) and School Choice and Performance (136 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Harvard Educational Review are Lee S. Shulman, Lisa Delpit, Carol Gilligan, Arthur R. Jensen, Henry A. Giroux, Elizabeth Ellsworth, Joseph A. Maxwell, Eve Tuck, Michelle Fine and Gloria Ladson‐Billings.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Harvard Educational Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Harvard Educational Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Harvard Educational Review.

Countries where authors publish in Harvard Educational Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Harvard Educational Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Harvard Educational Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harvard Educational Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025