Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development.
Countries citing papers authored by Carol Gilligan
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Carol Gilligan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carol Gilligan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carol Gilligan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carol Gilligan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carol Gilligan. The network helps show where Carol Gilligan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carol Gilligan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carol Gilligan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carol Gilligan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Carol Gilligan. Carol Gilligan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gilligan, Carol. (2012). Looking back to look forward: Revisiting in a different voice.7 indexed citations
3.
Gilligan, Carol. (2006). From in a different voice to the birth of pleasure: An intellectual journey. UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota). 81(4).2 indexed citations
Gilligan, Carol. (2001). Jiným hlasem - o rozdílné psychologii žen a mužů.1 indexed citations
6.
Brown, Lyn Mikel & Carol Gilligan. (1994). Die verlorene Stimme : Wendepunkte in der Entwicklung von Mädchen und Frauen. Campus Verlag eBooks.1 indexed citations
7.
Brown, Lyn Mikel & Carol Gilligan. (1992). Meeting at the Crossroads. Harvard University Press eBooks.275 indexed citations
8.
Gilligan, Carol, et al.. (1991). Special issue: Adolescence. Women & Therapy.2 indexed citations
9.
Gilligan, Carol. (1990). Joining the resistance: Psychology, politics, girls and women. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 24(4). 501–536.105 indexed citations
Gilligan, Carol & Jane S. Attanucci. (1988). Much ado about...knowing? noting? nothing? Sex differences and moral development. Merrill-palmer Quarterly. 34(4). 451–456.5 indexed citations
Gilligan, Carol. (1988). Die andere Stimme: Lebenskonflikte und Moral der Frau. Piper eBooks.28 indexed citations
14.
Gilligan, Carol & Jane S. Attanucci. (1988). Two Moral Orientations: Gender Differences and Similarities.. Merrill-palmer Quarterly. 34(3). 223–237.343 indexed citations
15.
Gilligan, Carol & Grant Wiggins. (1987). The origins of morality in early childhood relationships. 277–305.105 indexed citations
DuBois, Ellen Carol, et al.. (1984). Feminist discourse, moral values, and the law: A conversation. Buffalo law review. 34. 11–88.47 indexed citations
18.
Gilligan, Carol. (1984). The conquistador and the dark continent: Reflections on the psycyhology of love. Daedalus. 113(3). 75–95.10 indexed citations
19.
Gilligan, Carol. (1982). Why should a woman be more like a man. 68–77.12 indexed citations
20.
Kohlberg, Lawrence & Carol Gilligan. (1971). The Adolescent as a Philosopher: The Discovery of the Self in a Postconventional World.. Daedalus. 100(4). 1054–1087.159 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.