Focus on Exceptional Children

584 papers and 7.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 584 papers published in Focus on Exceptional Children in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Focus on Exceptional Children usually cover Education (180 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (102 papers) and Safety Research (64 papers) specifically the topics of Disability Education and Employment (56 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (52 papers) and Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Focus on Exceptional Children are George Sugai, Karen R. Harris, Steve Graham, Lynne Cook, Marilyn Friend, Timothy J. Lewis, Steve Graham, Lynn S. Fuchs, Cynthia M. Anderson and Robert H. Horner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Focus on Exceptional Children

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Focus on Exceptional Children. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Focus on Exceptional Children.

Countries where authors publish in Focus on Exceptional Children

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Focus on Exceptional Children. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Focus on Exceptional Children with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Focus on Exceptional Children more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025