Cultural Studies of Science Education

13.2k citations
1.1k papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Education top 5%
    • Science Education and Pedagogy
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
    • Indigenous and Place-Based Education

Papers in

    • Innovative Education and Learning Practices 97
    • Science Education and Pedagogy 290
    • Indigenous and Place-Based Education 135
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development 134
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 102

Cultural Studies of Science Education

1.0k papers receiving 12.1k citations

Peers

Cultural Studies of Science Education
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Education 8.7k
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 622
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 3.1k
  • Safety Research 1.6k
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.2k
Replace The Educational Forum with:
The Educational Forum United States
Journal of Geography in Higher Education United Kingdom
Cambridge Journal of Education United Kingdom
Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation Canada
Curriculum Inquiry United States
˜The œAustralian journal of teacher education Australia
Research in Science & Technological Education United Kingdom
Anthropology & Education Quarterly United States
Education 3-13 United Kingdom
Adult Education Quarterly United States
Cultural Studies of Science Education relative to The Educational Forum United States The Educational Forum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
The Educational Forum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Cultural Studies of Science Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cultural Studies of Science Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cultural Studies of Science Education more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education.

About Cultural Studies of Science Education

The 1.1k papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education in the last decades have received a total of 13.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education usually cover Human Factors and Ergonomics (97 papers), Education (746 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (292 papers), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (98 papers) and Safety Research (92 papers) specifically the topics of Science Education and Pedagogy (290 papers), Indigenous and Place-Based Education (135 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (134 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (114 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (102 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (97 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (96 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cultural Studies of Science Education are Wolff‐Michael Roth, Karen L. Tonso, Dana L. Zeidler, Kenneth Tobin, Lucy Avraamidou, Anna Stetsenko, Glen S. Aikenhead, Masakata Ogawa, Jesse Bazzul and Angela Calabrese Barton.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026