Zenaida Guadalupe
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Belén AyestaránLeticia Martínez‐LapuenteSilvia Pérez‐MagariñoMiriam Ortega-HerásAntonio PalaciosMaría P. DiagoJavier TardáguilaJosé David Carrillo
- Topics
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (54 papers)Horticultural and Viticultural Research (51 papers)Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (23 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryFood Chemistry
In The Last Decade
Zenaida Guadalupe
57 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Food Science 1.5k
- Plant Science 1.3k
- Biochemistry 625
- Molecular Biology 230
- Nutrition and Dietetics 151
Countries citing papers authored by Zenaida Guadalupe
This map shows the geographic impact of Zenaida Guadalupe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zenaida Guadalupe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zenaida Guadalupe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Zenaida Guadalupe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zenaida Guadalupe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zenaida Guadalupe. The network helps show where Zenaida Guadalupe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Zenaida Guadalupe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Zenaida Guadalupe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Zenaida Guadalupe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Zenaida Guadalupe. Zenaida Guadalupe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 58 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 60 | |
| 19 | 96 | |
| 20 | 47 |
About Zenaida Guadalupe
Zenaida Guadalupe is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Biochemistry and Food Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (54 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (51 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (625 citations), Food Science (1.5k citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (122 citations). Zenaida Guadalupe has collaborated with scholars based in Spain and France. Frequent co-authors include Belén Ayestarán, Leticia Martínez‐Lapuente, Silvia Pérez‐Magariño, Miriam Ortega-Herás, Antonio Palacios, María P. Diago, Javier Tardáguila, José David Carrillo, Thierry Doco and Julián C. Rivas‐Gonzalo. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.