Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Attitude toward the Site
1999600 citationsQimei Chen, William D. WellsJournal of Advertising Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by William D. Wells
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Wells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Wells
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Wells. The network helps show where William D. Wells may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William D. Wells
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William D. Wells.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William D. Wells based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William D. Wells. William D. Wells is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moriarty, Sandra E., Nancy Mitchell, & William D. Wells. (2015). Advertising & IMC : principles & practice.19 indexed citations
2.
Chen, Qimei & William D. Wells. (2001). .Com Satisfaction and .Com Dissatisfaction: One Or Two Constructs?. ACR North American Advances.20 indexed citations
Wells, William D. & Qimei Chen. (1999). Melodies and Counterpoints: American Thanksgiving and the Chinese Moon Festival. ACR North American Advances.3 indexed citations
Wells, William D.. (1994). Discussant's Comments Effective and Ineffective Drama Advertising. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
10.
Wells, William D.. (1994). Effective and ineffective drama advertising. Advances in consumer research. 21(1). 375–378.3 indexed citations
11.
Wells, William D.. (1989). Planning for R.O.I. : effective advertising strategy. Prentice Hall eBooks.16 indexed citations
12.
Wells, William D.. (1986). Three Useful Ideas. ACR North American Advances.21 indexed citations
13.
Wells, William D., et al.. (1986). The Micawber Connection: Subjective Discretionary Income. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
14.
Puto, Christopher P. & William D. Wells. (1984). Informational and Transformational Advertising: the Differential Effects of Time. ACR North American Advances.276 indexed citations
15.
Reynolds, Fred D., Melvin R. Crask, & William D. Wells. (1977). The Modern Feminine Life Style. Journal of Marketing. 41(3). 38–38.30 indexed citations
16.
Wells, William D.. (1974). Life style and psychographics.164 indexed citations
17.
Wells, William D. & Douglas J. Tigert. (1971). Activities, Interests and Opinions. Journal of Advertising Research. 11(4). 27–35.6 indexed citations
18.
Wells, William D.. (1965). Communicating with Children. Journal of Advertising Research. 5(2). 2–14.1 indexed citations
Wells, William D., et al.. (1962). Hidden Errors in Survey Data. Journal of Marketing. 26(4). 50–54.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.